MarkT

SoundClick Now!

Fundamentalism is a RECENT human invention

{ 11:04 AM, 20/9/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
      c. 4 BC Birth of Jesus
...
      70 Fall of Jerusalem
...
      202 Christians persecuted under Septimus Severus
      211 Christians tolerated under Emperor Antoninus Caracalla
      222 Christians favored Emperor Alexander Severus
      230 Origen's On First Principles
      235 Christians persecuted under Emperor Maximin the Thracian
      238 Christians tolerated under Emperor Gordian III
      244 Christians favored under Emperor Philip the Arabian
      251 Cyprian's Unity of the Catholic Church
      254 Death of Origen
      303 Diocletian orders burning of Christian books and churches
      312 Emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity
      313 Edict of Milan establishes official toleration of Christianity
      325 Council of Nicea
      336 Death of Constantine
      354 Birth of Augustine
      367 Athanasius lists all 27 books of NT
      379 Basil the Great dies
      380 Christianity made official religion of Roman Empire
      381 Council of Constantinople
      386 Augustine converts to Christianity
      389 Gregory of Nazianzus dies
      395 Gregory of Nyssa dies
      c. 400 Jerome's Vulgate (translation of the Greek Bible into Latin)
      407 John Chrysostom dies
      411 Council of Carthage condemns Donatists
      417 Pope Innocent I condemns Pelagianism
      420 Death of Jerome
      430 Death of Augustine
      431 Council of Ephesus
      451 Council of Chalcedon
      787 Second Council of Nicea
      950 Olga of Russia converts to Christianity
      1054 Great Schism between East and West
      1093 Anselm becomes Archbishop of Canterbury
      1095 Council of Clermont: Pope Urban II proclaims First Crusade
      1098 Crusaders take Antioch from Turks
      1099 Crusaders recapture Jerusalem from Turks
      1122 Concordat of Worms
      1141 Peter Abelard condemned
      1144 Fall of Edessa (crusader state)
      1187 Fall of Jerusalem to Turks
      1215 Fourth Lateran Council
      1309 "Babylonian Captivity" (until 1377)
      1337 Hundred Years' War (until 1453)
      1378 Great Western Schism (until 1423)
      1409 Council of Pisa
      1413-14 Lollard rebellion
      1415 Council of Constance. Martyrdom of Jan Hus.
      1420 Crusade against Hussites
      1431 Joan of Arc martyred
      1431-49 Council of Basel
      1438-45 Council of Ferrara-Florence
      1453 Fall of Constantinople to Turks
      1478 Spanish Inquisition founded by Ferdinand and Isabella
      1483 Birth of Martin Luther
      1492 Expulsion of Jews from Spain by Ferdinand and Isabella
      1505 Luther becomes a monk

#############################
PROTESTANTISM BEGINS
#############################

1517 Luther posts 95 Theses
      1521 Luther excommunicated
      1530 Augsburg Confession
      1534 Henry VIII's Act of Supremacy
      1536 Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion
      1541 Colloquy of Regensburg
      1555 Peace of Augsburg
      1559 Elizabeth I's Act of Uniformity
      1590 Michelangelo completes the dome of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome
      1609 Baptist Church founded by John Smyth
      1611 King James (Authorized) Version of the Bible produced
      1729 Beginnings of Methodism, led by John Wesley
      1738 John Wesley feels his "heart strangely warmed" during a reading of Luther's preface to Romans on Aldersgate Street in London
      1775 American Wars of Independence begin
      1783 America wins independence from Britain
      1793 Louis XVI executed
      1797 Second Awakening begins
      1798 Pope Pius VI is prisoner of France
      1799 Schleiermacher writes Speeches
      1801 Cane Ridge Revival
      1804 Napoleon becomes emperor
      1807 Hegel writes Phenomenology of the Spirit
      1808 French occupy Rome
      1810 Mexico wins independence
      1812-14 British-American War
      1814 Reorganization of the Jesuits
      1816 American Bible Society established
      1822 Schleiermacher writes Christian Faith
      1826 American Society for the Promotion of Temperance founded
      1830 Joseph Smith produces Book of Mormon
      1834 Spanish Inquisition officially abolished
      1838 Abolition of slavery in the British Caribbean
      1841 David Livingstone to Africa
      1845 Methodists and Baptists split over the issue of slavery
      1846 Pope Pius IX (until 1878)
      1854 Dogma of Immaculate Conception of Mary
      1859 Darwin publishes Origin of the Species
      1861-65 American Civil War
      1861 Presbyterians divide over the issue of slavery
      1869 First Vatican Council
      1870 Dogma of Papal Infallibility
      1872 Moody begins preaching
      1875 Mary Baker Eddy writes Science and Health
      1882 Neitzsche declares "God is dead"

#######################################
FUNDAMENTALISM BEGINS
######################################

   1895 Five Fundamentals
      1900 Freud's Interpretation of Dreams
      1906 Azusa Street revival
      1908 Henry Ford introduces the Model T
      1910 World Missionary Conference, Edinburgh
      1914 Assemblies of God founded
      1914-18 World War I
      1917 Russian Revolution
      1919 Prohibition passed into law
      1925 Scopes "Monkey" trial
      1932 Barth's Church Dogmatics
      1939 Hitler invades Poland and sparks WWI
      1945 Nag Hammadi Library discovered in Egypt;
      US drops atomic bombs on Japan
      1947 India wins independence from U.K.
      1948 World Council of Churches founded
      1950 Papal encyclical Humani generis
      1956 First issue of Christianity Today
      1960 Birth control pill approved by FDA
      1961 First human in space
      Papal encyclical Mater et Magistra
      1962-65 Second Vatican Council
      1963 MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech
      1968 Papal encyclical Humanae vitae
      1969 First man on the moon
      1971 Intel introduces the microprocessor
      1973 Roe vs. Wade
      1987-88 Televangelist scandals
      1989 First woman ordained in an apostolic-succession church (the
Protestant Episcopal church). Fall of the Berlin Wall.
      1997 Birth of the internet



from http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/timeline.htm


American Fundamentalists: Their Identification, Traits, and Proper Mockery

{ 10:08 AM, 22/3/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
American Fundamentalists: Their Identification, Traits, and Proper Mockery
By Michael
Created 03/06/2008 - 00:33

By Jeff Gustafson

Contrary to media representation, North American evangelicalism is by no
means the reflection of a single monolithic mentality. As the icy clutch of
diversity continues to wring dry the neck of the once predictably
Bible-thumpin', gay-bashin', infomercial givin' hegemony of the evangelical
church, it has been forced to accommodate a number of lifestyles and
cultures, none of which are particularly interesting. Still, spotting them
in the wild can be a dicey business. Here is each, according to their kind.


OLD-SCHOOL FUNDIES
Identification: As the name implies, this is the class of evangelical that
has changed the least since America's founding. They are mostly relegated to
the South, but with healthy distributions in the Midwest and Appalachian
regions, always in secluded areas. They are distinguished from other groups
mainly by their primitiveness and their tendency to spit a lot while
preaching. Forget televangelist sheen; these guys are the genuine article,
and as such are often disheveled and unwashed. (Fig 1.1) They tend to have
large, bulbous eyes, particularly when they're describing something from
Revelation. Don't be surprised if they've got a couple snakes hanging on
them. Oh, and guns. Lots of 'em.

Beliefs: Imagine the most seriously out-to-lunch ramblings of Pat Robertson,
or that guy who has that half-hour show on the end times on UPN, and
multiply it by ten. The ones that can read disagree with the theology of the
Left Behind series, but only because it isn't wacky enough. James Dobson's
claim that SpongeBob Squarepants supports the homosexual agenda is
insufficient-they cannot fathom a popular children's character who doesn't
support homosexuals, although their knowledge of cartoons is strictly
limited to hearsay, as none of them own TVs. In terms of the Bible, they
tend towards the sections that have God doing awesomely violent things while
including the Jesus stuff more or less as a concession. If you suggest that
perhaps the gospel accounts of Jesus don't always give an entirely
historical portrait, they'll probably set you on fire.

Evangelical Style: Turn or burn. Old-school fundies tend to be direct, and
prefer to tell you that you're going to hell to your face rather than
through the filter of TV or radio (neither of which they know how to
operate). They can be seen on college campuses or metropolitan areas making
a dramatic case for the Lord's judgment, frequently using a homemade
pedestal. This strikes people as cute and, in a hilarious misunderstanding
of the intent, they will often leave spare change.

Political Views: Politics are too much of an "of this world" thing for the
old-school fundie, so there is not much light to be shed in this section.
Even Christian "hot-button" issues like abortion and gay marriage don't sway
them (aside from the occasional clinic bomber), since their extreme zealotry
leads them to believe that even Bush is a rabid sodomite. A unique quality
of old-school fundies that could be construed as "progressive" is the fact
that they are about as likely to be black as white (KKK not included).

Musical Taste: You can never go wrong with old hymns, but I would submit
that more of them are into death metal than is commonly thought.

How to Tame an Old-School Fundie: Tell him that your favorite part of
Revelation is when the flying scorpions come to eat away at the unbelievers.
Be prepared for him to recite the rest of Revelation by memory. Make sure
there are no snakes on him before you make bodily contact. If social
niceties are out of the question, just shoot him before he shoots you.


MAINSTREAM FUNDIES

This class of evangelical is the kind which the media portrays most
accurately, which is fitting, since they are the most media-savvy. They have
much in common with their cousin the Old-School Fundie, but they are far
better dressed, are perhaps not quite so vitriolic in their preaching, and
have heard of the Internet. They can be found anywhere, but spotting them in
the wild is greatly simplified if you happen to know where the homosexual
agenda will hit next (Fig. 1.2); they await its strike like a reactionary
mongoose on its guard against a hypnotically amoral cobra. The main point of
divergence between old-school and mainstream fundies is in appearance. They
tend to favor the televangelist look for the men, conservative dresses for
the women. They don't carry around guns, but they have their Bible, and they
will fire with a rifleman's zeal.

Beliefs: The Bible is the infallible word of God. Every species of
evangelical will have some kind of statement to this effect, but they all
have to gay it up with their appeals to cultural context, proper
hermeneutical method, and the lexical-syntactical method, whatever that is.
They are the truest, bluest form of Biblical literalists, though they
probably won't set you on fire, unless you ask them to. They are comfortable
with a Left Behind level of nuttiness in interpreting the end times, and
they are the only known evangelical species to admit to enjoying the Book of
Leviticus. They're way more into Jesus than their more primitive brethren,
often pronouncing his name in three syllables ("Juh-EEZ-suss!") to fully
express their piety. Christ is the savior of the world, but He gives
preferential treatment to Americans-specifically, American Christians-so
that they will not have to be challenged with multiculturalism or slight
lifestyle changes ("persecution") in the pursuit of ultimate comfort . er,
holiness.

Evangelical Style: Despite their uncanny ability to embarrass themselves,
mainstream fundies maintain an imaginary public dignity that disallows them
from embracing the Turn-or-Burn approach directly. They prefer catchy
mantras like "The Condom Nation will receive Condemnation," or "Adam and Eve
not Adam and Steve," or "Keep your laws off my body"1 [1], and they have
been known to make subtle hints that God will bring natural disaster on
schools that vote against teaching intelligent design. They tend to at least
generate a conversational tone before they start preaching at you, and they
appeal just as much to God's love for you as to His unquenchable wrath.
     Since so much of their ministry revolves around politics, getting you
to vote for whoever they support on the tracts they send you is seen as akin
to saving your soul. Still, winning you over for Christ is their ultimate
goal, and they'll be the first to tell you that it would break their heart
to see you with the mark of the Beast on your forehead when the Judgment
comes.

Political Views: This is the group that spawned the Moral Majority and
Christian Coalition. They're sane enough to fit into the normal political
spectrum, but only just. They don't "hate" gays, but they DO think that the
gays have a vampiric lust to feed on the lifeblood of our children's moral
groundings. What's more, most of them read and agree with Ann Coulter, even
those who don't still think she's "on the right track." Their contempt for
public schools is second only to those who attend public schools. Most
mainstream fundies homeschool their kids, all the while fighting for the
inalienable rights of prayer, Bible indoctrination, and the stoning of
adulterous teachers within the secularized walls of the Damned.

Back in their heyday (which may still be now, for all anyone knows or
cares), the Christian Coalition would send out flyers to their perceived
constituencies that detailed the positions that various candidates held on
key issues. Did they sanction the killing of children? Were they capable of
spinning any left-leaning rhetoric of their opponent as anti-Christian? And
most importantly, were they possessed by Satan? All these and more were
given carefully thought-out answers by God's chosen people, that whosoever
should believe in them uncritically should not perish, but have everlasting
voting power (Gospel of Pat Robertson, verse 16).

Musical Taste: For this part, it's easier to go by what they disapprove of.
They hate anything on secular radio, including Radio Disney, since we all
know whose agenda Disney supports. They have been known to flog their
children for watching MTV (one of the few things that qualifies them as
decent parents), and even that stuff on the local Christian station is
getting a bit too edgy, what with the electric guitar and all.

How to Tame a Mainstream Fundie: Tell them to shut up. Their indignation at
this will manifest itself in an involuntary geyser of half-baked rhetoric
about how the persecution of Christians is what's sending America into the
abyss and the separation of church and state is just a secular myth and so
forth. I guess you can't really "tame" a mainstream fundie, you can just get
them to ramble incessantly, which will at best put them in a sort of trance.
Our best field naturalists are still working on this one.


1The notion that this originated with pro-choice feminists is false. It was
principally a mantra used by public-school attending children of mainstream
fundies, whose parents' zeal for seeing the 10 commandments displayed in the
public arena was made manifest by the branding of 1-10 of the commandments
on their children's backs. This would mark the first-and last-time that
feminists would ever borrow a slogan from evangelically parented
schoolchildren.

From http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/american-fundamentalists


Ten Verses Never Preached On

{ 4:32 PM, 5/2/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
Ten Verses Never Preached On

Written Dec 5th, 2006 by Josh Rives ...

10. 2 Kings 2:23-24 NKJV

  Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up the road,
some youths came from the city and mocked him, and said to him, "Go up, you
baldhead! Go up, you baldhead!" So he turned around and looked at them, and
pronounced a curse on them in the name of the LORD. And two female bears
came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the youths.

Comments: George Costanza envokes the wrath of God.

9. Mark 14:51-52 NASB

  A young man was following Him, wearing nothing but a linen sheet over his
naked body; and they seized him. But he pulled free of the linen sheet and
escaped naked.

Comments: Possibly the first streaker in history.



8. Deuteronomy 23:1 ESV

  No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall
enter the assembly of the Lord.

Comments: We can't just be letting anyone in. We have to draw the line
somewhere.

7. Genesis 38:8-10 NASB

  Then Judah said to Onan, "Go in to your brother's wife, and perform your
duty as a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother."
Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so when he went in to his
brother's wife, he wasted his seed on the ground in order not to give
offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of
the LORD; so He took his life also.

Comments: Not only do you have to carry the body out, but you have to mop
the floor too.



6. 1 Samuel 18:25-27 ESV

  Then Saul said, "Thus shall you say to David, 'The king desires no
bride-price except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, that he may be
avenged of the king's enemies.'" Now Saul thought to make David fall by the
hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it
pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law. Before the time had expired,
David arose and went, along with his men, and killed two hundred of the
Philistines. And David brought their foreskins, which were given in full
number to the king, that he might become the king's son-in-law. And Saul
gave him his daughter Michal for a wife.

Comments: How do you present a gift like that? Do you tie a bow on the box?

5. Exodus 4:24-25 NASB

  Now it came about at the lodging place on the way that the LORD met him
and sought to put him to death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her
son's foreskin and threw it at Moses' feet, and she said, "You are indeed a
bridegroom of blood to me."

Comments: I imagine the son was screaming in pain and Moses just kinda
stared at it in disgust.

4. Ezekiel 16:17 NIV

  You also took the fine jewelry I gave you, the jewelry made of my gold and
silver, and you made for yourself male idols and engaged in prostitution
with them.

Comments: What did she do with her gold and silver idols?



3. Ezekiel 23:19-20 NET

  Yet she increased her prostitution, remembering the days of her youth when
she engaged in prostitution in the land of Egypt. She lusted after their
genitals as large as those of donkeys, and their seminal emission was as
strong as that of stallions.

Comments: Can't wait to hear this taught from a pulpit.

2. Judges 3:19-25 ESV

  And Ehud reached with his left hand, took the sword from his right thigh,
and thrust it into his belly. And the hilt also went in after the blade, and
the fat closed over the blade, for he did not pull the sword out of his
belly; and the dung came out.

Comments: Apparently the sword pierced all the way through and something
unexpected came out the other side. The author felt this was a necessary
detail to include.

1. Deuteronomy 25:11-12 NASB

  If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the
wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who
is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you
shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity.



  from http://www.churchhopping.com/ten-verses-never-preached-on/


BRead Of Life

{ 4:26 PM, 5/2/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
"Allan Svensson" <allan-sv@algonet.se> wrote:

> God's word is the Bread of Life


I suggest shipping bibles out to every poor household so that they can eat their bibles instead of food.

Can anyone give me the nutritional breakdown of a bible sans fibre?



Death Certificate - "Taken By The Lord"

{ 4:21 PM, 5/2/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
Trew Kristyuns (as I was told by a Trew Kristyun couple quoting Psalm 91)
get taken by "the Lord" and don't actually die from any known cause.  The
Death Certificate must read "Taken by the Lord" for every Trew Kristyun. ;-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Psalm 91 (New International Version)
 1 He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High
       will rest in the shadow of the Almighty. [a]
 2 I will say [b] of the LORD, "He is my refuge and my fortress,
       my God, in whom I trust."

 3 Surely he will save you from the fowler's snare
       and from the deadly pestilence.

 4 He will cover you with his feathers,
       and under his wings you will find refuge;
       his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.

 5 You will not fear the terror of night,
       nor the arrow that flies by day,

 6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness,
       nor the plague that destroys at midday.

 7 A thousand may fall at your side,
       ten thousand at your right hand,
       but it will not come near you.

 8 You will only observe with your eyes
       and see the punishment of the wicked.

 9 If you make the Most High your dwelling-
       even the LORD, who is my refuge-

 10 then no harm will befall you,
       no disaster will come near your tent.

 11 For he will command his angels concerning you
       to guard you in all your ways;

 12 they will lift you up in their hands,
       so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.

 13 You will tread upon the lion and the cobra;
       you will trample the great lion and the serpent.

 14 "Because he loves me," says the LORD, "I will rescue him;
       I will protect him, for he acknowledges my name.

 15 He will call upon me, and I will answer him;
       I will be with him in trouble,
       I will deliver him and honor him.

 16 With long life will I satisfy him
       and show him my salvation."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Top 10 Political Activities of Fundamentalists

{ 4:24 PM, 24/1/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }


10. Restrict the teaching of science to help indoctrinate non-Christian
children in public schools.

9. Pressure people to say under God during the pledge. Use this pledge to
claim atheists aren't citizens.

8. Stop scientific and medical research deemed offensive to their religion.

7. Censor books offensive to their faith.

6. Pass anti-gay legislation.

5. Use the taxpayer dollars, including those contributed by non-Christians,
to fund religious monuments.

4. Legislate morality, forcing other citizens to conform to Christian
standards.

3. Give taxpayer dollars to faith-based charities that promote Christianity.

2. Move the country closer to Christian theocracy.

...and the #1 political activity of Fundamentalist Christians...

1. Whine endlessly about how oppressed Christians are in this country.


from http://www.godvsthebible.com/top10list3.htm



V. Sexual Roots of the Fundamentalist Psyche "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVIS

{ 4:19 PM, 24/1/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
January 8 / 9, 2005
Bible Says
The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism
By WALTER A. DAVIS

  "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against."

  Kenneth Burke

....

V. Sexual Roots of the Fundamentalist Psyche

...

Fundamentalists live in a world obsessed with sexuality. It provides the
primary texts of Biblical citation. It's the concrete referent of the
fulminations against secularism, secular humanism, post-modernism, ethical
relativism, feminism, deconstructionism, etc. It's also what the vaunted
claim of "moral values" is all about. Morality is not about a life of
charity, or the pursuit of justice, or the opening of oneself to the depth
of human suffering. It's about avoiding certain sexual sins and fixating on
that dimension of life to the virtual exclusion of everything else. Battling
sex is apparently what life is all about as if the primary plan of the
creator were to put us on earth so that we'll be tempted by that in us that
we must condemn in order to win salvation. By the same token, each new
scandal reveals the consequences of sexual repression: the brutal abuse of
young boys by a legion of pedophile priests; the sexual license of Jim Jones
and David Koresh; the sadomasochistic bondage rituals that Jimmy Swaggart
significantly could only enact with prostitutes; the epidemic of physical,
sexual, and psychological abuse that is the untold story of the
fundamentalist family. The repression of sexuality has as a necessary
consequence the brutalization of the other.

All such phenomena are variations on the same tired story. Sexual repression
breeds foul imaginings. Which of necessity fixate on the sexual. What has
been rendered foul within runs amuck in the world. Following the dictates of
a punitive super-ego the psyche becomes obsessed with the attack on
sexuality. The purpose is to render evil virtually everything connected with
sex until life itself is reduced to an allegory in which the battle of good
and evil is all about the temptations of the flesh, as if nothing else in
life matters so complete is the vindictive fixation of the Deity on the
human genitals.

...

Because it poses a comprehensive threat to the fundamentalist project eros
must be poisoned at early as possible. Ironically there is, however, only
one way this project can succeed. Through love. To summarize briefly a
concept I've developed at length elsewhere, parenting is the act through
which the parent's conscious and unconscious conflicts and desires become
the psyche of the child. This transmission is the act through which the
child's psyche is born. The child's unconditional love is the condition that
makes it all possible. To put it in more concrete terms, from an early age
one must be indoctrinated by those one trusts and loves in the primary
lesson: that obedience is the price one must pay to retain love. And so deep
must become one's need for this love that one becomes willing to make any
sacrifice it requires. ...

The goal of fundamentalist child-rearing is to create a subject preoccupied
with waging war on itself, with battling against its own desires under the
gaze of a judgmental, punitive super-ego. [4]

... What else could child-rearing be for the parents but the chance to prove
themselves to the Lord by taking whatever measures
are required to assure that His commands assume total control over the
child's psyche. Getting the child to internalize a super-ego that makes
guilt over one's desires the primary relationship the subject has to itself
assumes in fundamentalism the status of a categorical imperative. Life must
be filled up with inhibitions and prohibitions in order to assure that
sexuality will always be experienced as a fall into sin. Internally that
experience is guaranteed by the condition that lays in wait to assault the
transgressive psyche, even when the transgression is only in thought or
fantasy. Transgression, one discovers, floods the psyche with guilt, shame,
and the conviction of a fundamental badness that can only be purged by an
attack on oneself. ...

Sexuality has been transformed into the festering wound out of which
resentment is born. For every time desire rises up one experiences again
one's powerlessness to break the strangle-hold the super-ego has over one's
sexuality. A jaundiced eye then casts its gaze on all who have succeeded
where one failed Envy rises up, offering one the only exit from inner
conflict--hatred of the sexual and an unending war upon it. That war has
become one's deepest necessity. Envy begets hatred begets rage. The only way
to relieve that rage is by projecting it onto the world. That act has an
added charm: it is the way one achieves identification with that super-ego
that has never stopped assaulting one from within. As avenging angel damning
a sinful world one reclaims as resentment what one has had to sacrifice as
desire. The transformation is complete. One is no longer a child tortured
into submission by a punitive super-ego. One has become an adult projecting
that destructiveness upon the world. ...

....  Equally misplaced is the attempt to confine fundamentalism to
preachers in the Bible-belt. Fundamentalism is on the rise today and takes
many forms because it speaks to something that has long been active in
Christianity, something that the old Church exemplified and that we may find
impossible to expunge from Judeo-Christianity in general because the truth
of the matter is the
existence of a contiuum that finds fundamentalism in the position of the
Hegelian Notion, the telos and immanent logos that develops through the
course of Judeo-Christianity until it achieves in fundamentalism its proper
and final form. ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University.
He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic
Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu.


from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html


IV. Apocalypticism-The Heart of the Ulcer "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVIS

{ 4:18 PM, 24/1/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
January 8 / 9, 2005
Bible Says
The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism
By WALTER A. DAVIS

  "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against."

  Kenneth Burke

...


IV. Apocalypticism-The Heart of the Ulcer

  "Devout believers are safeguarded in a high degree against the risk of
certain neurotic illnesses; their acceptance of the universal neurosis
spares them the task of constructing the personal one."

  Freud

Apocalypticism is the capstone that completes the process of fundamentalist
self-fashioning. Without it, as we'll see, the entire edifice would crumble.
...  In the Apocalyptic fantasm an ultimate expression is given
to the conflicts that define the fundamentalist psyche through an action
that brings an end to those conflicts.

The necessity of Apocalypticism is a direct outgrowth of the psychological
mechanism on which fundamentalist relies to structure the world. The only
way to prevent a return of the projections is through a final evacuation.
This desire can only come to fruition with the picturing of a world beyond
redemption held under the brand of an all-consuming wrath. That image
finalizes the split that defines the psyche by giving sublime expression to
the way one must view the world when seeing it from the standpoint of one's
salvation. Apocalypticism thus brings to completion the psychological
operation that has been employed repeatedly from the beginning. First, one
cleanses oneself by projecting one's disowned desires unto the world. The
resulting split must then be maintained rigorously with nothing allowed to
fall outside its scope. The psyche must be voided of everything save the
serenities of the saved. For that to happen, however, the world must become
the object of an unstinting attack on all that one has externalized there.
This act must be endless lest the projections return. By its internal logic
fundamentalism is thus driven ineluctably to a need for quantitative
expansion through the discovery of greater, more insidious forms of evil.
The mathematical sublime beckons, the need to produce greater and greater
magnitudes. The world becomes the polluted chamber of one's foulest
imaginings with no way to check the demands of that vision. Within the
psyche an even greater transformation occurs. One craves the constant
exercise of an emotion that one must just as strenuously disclaim. Hatred.
One needs fresh supplies of it as badly as the U.S. needs to ransack the
globe for fresh supplies of oil. No matter how loudly one proclaims one's
salvation, purified in the blood of the lamb, hatred has become the
innermost necessity to which one is wedded. And that necessity has now
broken lose of any containment. Hatred of one's former self is no longer
sufficient. One now hates the world and is driven to seek out everything in
it that one can claim caused or can cause an inner condition other than the
purity of the saved. One hates, that is, everything that resists surrender
and absolute obedience to the system of literalism and literal commands to
which one has committed oneself. As the scope of what one hates grows apace
it finds fruition in the binary opposition that is essential to it. Good and
Evil divide the world in two, giving ontological form to the rigidity of the
split that defines the fundamentalist psyche. All differences, all
particularities, all complexities must give way to the demands of a
comprehensive abstraction. And the fury of that abstraction can and will
brook no exceptions. Everything thus resolves itself into the ultimate
necessity required by the informing hatred. One longs for and demands an end
to all the contingencies that have from the beginning been sources of fear
and confusion. It is what one has always sought. To be done with all of it.
With the contingency of the human. To be done with all ambiguity and
complexity and confusion. Done with the feeling that history has no purpose
other than chaos or meaningless repetition. Done with embodiment itself- and
all the unwelcome desires it imposes on us. Done with the very sources of
all that one hates and fears. To locate it all ontologically in a single
principle-evil-and then be rid of it all once and for all through the
triumph of that force that has the power to extinguish it all.

..... The world  keeps seeping it. There must be a way to be done with it,
once and for all. To find what one has craved from the beginning. The end.
And a proper end-one that will give sublime expression to the desire that
has fed the
whole thing. Death. The longing for death transformed into a sublime
celebration of death. Life in its complexity demands too much of us. That in
a nutshell is the fundamentalist message. Only death can deliver one from
the threat life poses. Only when life is done is one safe from a return of
the projections and an eruption of the repressed. One has always longed for
deliverance into a realm free of desire and all its temptations. Death alone
offers the comfort one seeks. .....  Thank God for The Book of
Revelations. For the only way both to satisfy and to purge one's hatred is
to express it on a massive world-shattering scale. The death one seeks
projected into the death one delivers. The self is thereby done with life
and freed for transport of the saved split off self to a realm of bliss
freed from all cares. A psyche wedded to thanatos has found in thanatos the
final solution. One's resentment against life has been turned into a
righteous and of necessity cosmic attack upon it.

...

Here then a reading of the function that Revelations plays in the
fundamentalist psyche. In the depths of its psyche fundamentalism is ruled
by catastrophic anxiety, a self tottering on the brink of a dissolution in
which it will fragment imprisoned in a world that will impose all of its
terrors and evils upon it. We will fail to understand fundamentalism as long
as we resist seeing how close it is to a psychosis. Fundamentalist rage is
the attempt of a subject to hold itself together in the only way it can: by
waging war on all that terrifies it. The psyche commits itself to
destructiveness to allay a destruction that already threatens it from
within. That condition results in a paradoxical situation that finds its
only possible solution in Revelations. Destructiveness must be given a full,
unchecked expression and the psyche must somehow survive that act.


.... It is hard to conceive the extent of the contempt for life that informs
fundamentalism.

....


~~~~~~~~~

Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University.
He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic
Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu.



from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html


1. LITERALISM "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVIS

{ 4:17 PM, 24/1/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
January 8 / 9, 2005
Bible Says
The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism
By WALTER A. DAVIS

  "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against."

  Kenneth Burke

In Apocalypse, a patient study of Christian fundamentalism based on
extensive interviews over a five year period with members of apocalyptic
communities Charles Strozier identifies four basic beliefs as fundamental to
Christian fundamentalism. (1) Inerrancy or biblical literalism, the belief
that every word of the Bible is to be taken literally as the word of God;
(2) conversion or the experience of being reborn in Christ; (3)
evangelicalism or the duty of the saved to spread the gospel; and (4)
Apocalypticism or Endism, the belief that The Book of Revelations describes
the events that must come to pass for God's plan to be fulfilled. [1]
Revelations thus becomes an object of longing as well as the key to
understanding contemporary history, to reading the news of the day and
keeping a handle on an otherwise overwhelming world. Each of these
categories, Strozier adds, must be understood not doctrinally but
psychologically. What follows attempts to constitute such an understanding
by analyzing each category as the progression of a disorder that finds the
end it seeks in Apocalyptic destructiveness. ...

I. Literalism

  "I don't do nuance."

  Dubya0

Literalism is the linchpin of fundamentalism; the literalization, if you
will, of the founding psychological need. For an absolute certitude that can
be established at the level of facts that will admit of no ambiguity or
interpretation. ... But to eliminate ambiguity and confusion one must attack
its source. Figurative language. That is the danger that must be avoided at
all costs because in place of the literal figurative language introduces the
play of meaning. The need to sustain complex connections at the level of
thought (not fact) through the evolution of mental abilities that are
necessarily connected with developing all the metaphoric resources of
language. The literal in contrast puts an end to thought. It offers the mind
a way to shut down, to reify itself. It thereby exorcises the greatest fear:
interpretation and its inevitable result, the conflict of interpretations
and with it the terror of being forever bereft of dogmatic certitudes. ....

.... It's innermost necessity is the resistance to metaphor. For with
metaphor one enters a world that has the power to unravel the literal mind.
...

Literalism is the first line of defense of a mind that wants to put itself
to sleep. ... The way: the refusal to comprehend anything that exceeds the
limits of the simple declarative sentence. Two reductions thereby feed on
one another: the world is reduced to facts and simples; the mind reduced to
a permanently blank slate.

Fundamentalism feeds on and fosters this reduction of the mind to the
conditions of the immediate. For in fundamentalism literalism is raised to
the status of a categorical imperative. It is the law that assures
deliverance from all confusion. There is a single text, the Holy Bible. It
contains clear, simple direct messages-proclamations-that establish the
Truth once and for all. All of life's questions and contingencies are
resolved by statements that are beyond change and interpretation. Literalism
reduces reading and interpretation to the Cratylean dream: one need only
point to the appropriate passage and "Pouf" all doubt and ambiguity about
what one should think, believe, or desire on a given situation vanishes. ...

When approached literally the Book of necessity takes on a number of other
characteristics. Everything in it must be factual and nothing outside the
book can contradict those facts. The very possibility of scientific
investigation is sacrificed a priori to the need to proclaim the text's
inerrancy. Every word of it must be the unalterable and unchanging word of
God, which of course can contain no contradictions. ...

The Book cannot be read progressively or retroactively, despite Christ's
repeated claims to cancel the old law. An eye for an eye remains true for
all time however out of keeping with the law of charity. After all, "It's in
the Bible." That repeated assertion expresses the essence and fundamental
paralysis of the literal mind. ...

God's role is set by the limitations of the literal "imagination." His job
is to lay down the law, once and for all, and in no uncertain terms; to be
that super-ego who operates by the only logic that literalism permits-binary
opposition. All conflicts and confusions must be resolved into a sharp,
simple, and comprehensive opposition between Good and Evil. Else comes again
the fit of contingency and ambiguity. Binarism is the realization in logic
of the literalist attitude toward language. The reduction of language to the
declarative statement is matched in binarism by a logic that turns
everything into an abstract allegory.

The most interesting reach of literalism comes, however, in the
interpretation of the prophetic writings, especially Revelations. Here
confronting what even it must see as image and metaphor, literalism performs
the only operation that makes sense to it. The metaphoric is literalized.
Armageddon must takes place on the plain of Jezreel near the ancient
military fortification of Megiddo (35 miles southeast of Haifa), even though
this patch of land "is not tomb enough and continent to hide the slain."
.... Anything and everything that happens in the Middle East must be scanned
as a sign that we are indeed moving toward the Tribulation. When he speaks
prophetically God is playing a little game with us, to activate what in
fundamentalism passes as the exercise of imagination. To make sense of the
text requires the precise matching of its ornate and expressionist images to
persons, places and events which are thereby assigned the only meaning they
can have. Mapped onto history the Bible offers us an absolute certitude
about history, thereby vanquishing the greatest contingency. ... All we have
to do is literally match a prophecy to a contingency and Voila! we have
attained literal certitude or, what amounts to the same thing, the
fantasmatic imposition upon reality of what we want to believe. [2]

In all these operations sustaining a literal interpretation of the Bible is
a desperate necessity. Once let go of that and the Book slips away into the
hands of those who eventually will find anything in it-liberation theology,
Bonhoeffer's religionless Christianity, a searing message of love-since they
will be guided in their reading by nothing but the attempt to sustain a
heart in conflict with itself using a book to pry open the deepest and most
conflicted registers of its own interiority. Who can tell, perhaps this
approach could even lead to the discovery that the Book hates the simple
minded; that it is indeed Kafkaesque in offering parables and prophecies
that only deepen our burden by demanding an intelligence equal to the
complexity of the human heart.

Literalism is a cardinal necessity of the fundamentalist because it
guarantees the primary psychological need. For a certitude that in its
simplicity puts an end to all doubt, even to the possibility of doubt. That
is what one must have and once attained what nothing can be permitted to
alter. The literal meaning of words one need only point to for that meaning
to be established must be imposed on the world without a blink of
hesitation, a shadow of doubt, and when necessary beyond any appeal to the
simplest claims of our humanity. ....

... Literalism protects the heart from everything, even its own deepest
urgings.

... Literalism is the way, but hatred is the through line. That is why
fundamentalist certitude always becomes rectitude with the Bible mined for
all the things one can label abomination. Thereby a sensibility that wants
to have nothing to do with the world takes revenge upon it. On the surface
literalism looks like a characteristic of fundamentalism free of
psychological motives; on investigation it reveals itself as one of the
clearest signs of the psychological need in which the entire project is
grounded. Literalism is the first realization of the psychological root of
fundamentalism: a fear and hatred of the contingencies that constitute being
in the world. That is the first threat that must be vanquished. ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University.
He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic
Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu.



ENDNOTES:

(1) Charles Strozier, Apocalypse: On the Psychology of Fundamentalism in
America (Boston: Beacon Press, 1994).

(2) Fundamentalist readings of Revelations are an exercise in interpretive
ingenuity in service to an ox-like stupidity. Every image in the text must
be literalized and attached to a specific event or person. So that in the
grandest feat of fundamentalist interpretation everything in Revelations
squares with specific details of contemporary history. But of course this
effort requires its own revisionism since this operation must be performed
repeatedly, as it has been in America by fundamentalists since the 1840's.
The same drama, ever approaching, ever delayed (and more's the pity), with
history and its participants made stock figures in an abstract allegory. In
service to the fundamentalist dream: that grand day when it will all finally
fall into place, no more disappointing prefigurements, but the real thing.
The act of interpretation in such a framework is both mechanical and mad.
The frantic search is always on for events that will tie down and confirm
the bizarre images of Revelations since they provide the secret code to the
meaning of history. Thus the fundamentalist as reader driven half-mad in the
constant mental gymnastics required to puzzle the whole thing out then just
as constantly revise the thing, as events dictate, with no way to stop
playing this game.



from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html


--

Appealing Apostate: Prodigal Son Frank Schaeffer Roasts Religious Right

{ 8:15 AM, 14/1/2008 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

January 8th 2008

Writes Schaeffer in his book, "Pat Robertson.would have had a hard time finding work in any job where hearing voices is not a requirement."

It's always interesting when a high-profile Religious Right activist has a change of heart.

Consider Frank Schaeffer. The name may not be familiar to you, but Schaeffer's father, theologian and Presbyterian pastor Francis Schaeffer, was pivotal in the creation of the Religious Right. As John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute wrote recently, "In fact, without the influence of Francis Schaeffer, who often was prodded into action by Frank, the so-called Christian Right of today would not exist."

Whitehead asserts that Francis Schaeffer's books How Should We Then Live? and Whatever Happened to the Human Race? "set the tone and agenda for the emerging Christian Right" and that without them "it is highly unlikely that people such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, Tim LaHaye and
others would have had the political influence they wield." (Frank Schaeffer later made both books into films that were hugely influential in the evangelical community.)

Frank Schaeffer shared his father's opinions and, as an adult, worked alongside him. He had an insider's view of the rise of the Religious Right. Father and son were there at the movement's birth and worked with some of its biggest names.

What does Frank Schaeffer think about the Religious Right these days? Let's just say he's not a fan. He refers to Robertson as "a lunatic" and says Dobson is "a power-crazed political manipulator cynically abusing his followers." He calls the late Jerry Falwell an "unreconstructed bigot."

Consider these choice quotes from Schaeffer's recently published book, Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back:

* "What I slowly realized was that the religious-right leaders we were helping to gain power were not 'conservatives' at all, in the old sense of the world. They were anti-American religious revolutionaries."

* "Pat Robertson.would have had a hard time finding work in any job where hearing voices is not a requirement."

* "Dad could hardly have imagined how they would help facilitate the instantly corrupted power-crazy new generation of evangelical public figures like Ralph Reed, who took money from the casino industry while allegedly playing both sides against the middle in events related to the Abramoff Washington lobbyist scandal."

* "Long before Ralph Reed and his ilk came on the scene, Dad got sick of 'these idiots' as he often called people like Dobson in private. They were 'plastic,' Dad said, and 'power-hungry.'"

* "There were three kinds of evangelical leaders: The dumb or idealistic ones who really believed. The out-and-out charlatans. And the smart ones who still believed - sort of - but knew that the evangelical world was sh*t, but who couldn't figure out any way to earn as good a living anywhere else."

* "Dad seemed lost in a depressed daze. He had recently been saying privately that the evangelical world was more or less being led by lunatics, psychopaths, and extremists, and agreeing with me that if 'our side' ever won, America would be in deep trouble."

Ouch. Opponents sometimes accuse Americans United of being too critical of the Religious Right, but these days it seems some of the most pointed barbs are coming from people like Schaeffer, Whitehead and syndicated columnist Cal Thomas. (Thomas, a former Moral Majority employee, coauthored Blinded by the Might: Why the Religious Right Can't Save America in 2000.)

In a recent interview with Whitehead, Schaeffer discussed his break with the Religious Right, remarking, "I personally came to believe that a lot of the issues that were being latched onto by the Christian Right, whether it was the gay issue or abortion or other things, were actually being used for negative political purposes. They were used to structure a power base for people who then threw their weight around."

He continues, "The other thing I began to understand is that in dismissing the whole culture as decadent, in dismissing the public school movement as godless, in talking about anybody who opposed them as evil, the Religious Right was only a mirror image of the New Left..What gets left out is a basic discussion about the United States and the reality of living here, the freedoms we enjoy and the benefits of a pluralistic culture where people are not crushing each other over beliefs."

Elsewhere in the interview, Schaeffer says that banning all abortions is unrealistic, criticizes the Religious Right for gay bashing and calls George W. Bush "arguably the worst president in the history of the United States."

Advocates of church-state separation won't agree with everything Schaeffer has to say, but the interview is well worth a look. It's a helpful reminder that people from all walks of life oppose the goals of the Religious Right - including some folks who know it best because they once saw its ugly inner workings up close and personal.

By Rob Boston

http://blog.au.org/2008/01/08/appealing-apostate-prodigal-son-frank-schaeffer-roasts-religious-right/



A Psychological Analysis of Fundamentalism

{ 4:44 PM, 2/3/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

Fundamentalism is a religious movement, a theological & philosophical stand, a political and social force. I regard it most basically as a particular variety of psychological development. Fundamentalists of all religious and political varieties share the same character traits. It is the psychological character of the fundamentalist that is at the root of the ideological interpretation termed "fundamentalism," not an intellectual or spiritual concept.

"Fundamentalist" is a term sometimes used to refer to anyone who is intolerant of other's beliefs. Fundamentalism is "not so much an ideology as it is an attitude, an attitude of intolerance, incivility and narrowness," says Walter Shurden, professor of Christianity and director of the Center for Baptist Studies at Mercer University. "It is an attitude that says, 'We
have the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and we are going to impose it on you and control the system so that you will have to knuckle under to it.'" As anyone who has ever attended a meeting of two or more activists can attest, that attitude can be found at all points on the political and religious spectrum.

There are, however, specific traits to what can be called "right wing" fundamentalism (of any religion) that what is sometimes called "left wing fundamentalism" lacks: authoritarianism, sexual guilt, and attitudes toward women and homosexuals.

Psychological traits of fundamentalism:

a.. A strictly hierarchical and authoritarian worldview. Everything has to have a First, a Somebody in Charge. In any partnership, one partner has to have the deciding vote. Groups and societies work best with rigidly defined roles and stratifications. (There are people who believe this way who are not fundamentalists: at least, not religious fundamentalists.)

b.. Ethical development at the "reward and punishment" stage: morality must be defined and enforced by an external authority.

c.. A lot of guilt and fear about sex.

d.. Basic distrust of human beings; certainty that "uncontrolled," human beings will be bad and vicious, particularly in sexual ways.

e.. Low tolerance for ambiguity. Everything must be clear cut, black and white. Nothing can be "possibly true but unproven at this time, we're still studying it." Fundamentalists regard science as flawed precisely because science changes. (A striking characteristic of fundamentalists is that their response to any setback which may instill doubt is to step up evangelizing for converts.)

f.. Literalism, usually including a limited sense of humor.

g.. Distrust of their own judgment, or any other human being's judgment.

h.. Fear of the future. The driving motivation of fundamentalism appears to outsiders to be fear that oneself or the group one identifies with is losing power and prerequisites and is in danger from others who are gaining power. This is not how fundamentalists put it.

i.. A low self-esteem that finds satisfaction in being one of the Elect, superior to all others. It seems to be particularly rewarding to know that rich people have a real hard time getting into Heaven.

The life experience of fundamentalist that seems to encourage these traits include:

a.. Conditional love: parents, or other authority figures, withheld love to control behavior.

b.. Other factors -- sometimes mental, emotional, or even physical abuse -- that minimized self-esteem.

c.. For those who grew up fundamentalist, the church was the central activity of family life, all else was subsidiary to the church, and social interaction with "non-believers" was discouraged, except when evangelizing.

d.. Those who have converted to fundamentalism often grew up without any firm philosophical framework, or experienced some trauma that destroyed their former framework. They were at a time in their lives when they needed absolute Answers.

Fundamentalist groups reinforce these traits:

a.. They insist on a rigid hierarchy of authority. The more extreme the group, the more authority is concentrated in one central figure.

 

b.. The group, and the authority figure(s) within the group, withhold or bestow love to control behavior. Misbehaving members are cut off from communication.

c.. They magnify current social and individual evils and dwell on the "innate wickedness of man."

d.. Sexual "immorality" is often their central cause.

e.. They promote a Truth which is superior to all other truths because it is absolute and unchanging.

f.. They promote distrust of one's personal judgment, being subject instead to the given truths of the group, the judgment of the church as a body, or the proclamations of a central authority figure.

g.. They are apocalyptic, foretelling an immanent and horrifying future which only the faithful will survive. Any disaster in the news is magnified as "a sign of the apocalypse.

The Alternative to Fundamentalism

Regardless of belief system, an individual is no longer a "fundamentalist" when one develops:

a.. An unconditional self-esteem and (usually in consequence) an unconditional love of others.

b.. A tolerance -- even enjoyment -- of ambiguity and diverse beliefs. One can cheerfully live with the fact that one's neighbor on one side believes that his little blue pickup truck is God and one's neighbor on the other side doesn't believe in God at all, and feel no compulsion to convert either of them. One is not frightened to question one's faith or explore alternatives.

c.. Free social and intellectual interaction with others, beyond -- or even without -- evangelism.

d.. A trust that one can "figure things out," along with a willingness to learn from others and to change one's mind.

e.. A faith that whatever the fluctuations in life and society, things can and will get better. A feeling of personal responsibility and resolve to make it so.

f.. A sense of humor.

It is not necessary to abandon all personal faith and beliefs in order to be tolerant of others. The majority of the followers in any of the world's religions are able to hold a strong personal belief and not feel threatened that others hold different beliefs.

How does anyone ever become an ex-fundamentalist? Any or all of these factors seem effective:

a.. Relationships with "non-believers" who become emotionally valued.

b.. Intellectual process: a build-up of contradictions between taught morality and the behavior of church authorities and members; unresolved questions in study of the Bible; what is taught about the world vs observation.

c.. Receiving unconditional love and acceptance from a non-fundamentalist.

d.. A strengthened self-esteem, with the loss of the need for others to be Wrong.

e.. A spiritual epiphany, with a new faith that one's relationship with God is not conditional on "perfect" faith or behavior, that it can grow and change.

© Anitra L. Freeman / Updated December 13, 2002

from http://anitra.net/activism/fundamentalism/psychology.html



Fundamentalists Anonymous: Twelve Steps to Sanity

{ 4:43 PM, 2/3/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
by Lee Adams Young

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All who have chosen to walk away from biblical fundamentalism are welcome to join Fundamentalists Anonymous, and to consider embracing the following Twelve Steps:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. I realize that I had turned control of my mind over to another person or group, who had assumed power over my thinking.

2. That person or group persuaded me of the inerrancy of the Bible, in spite of its many internal contradictions.

3. I became addicted to the Bible as the supreme focus of my faith, in spite of the commandment that God should come first.

4. I admit to God, to myself and to another person the shortcomings of my belief in the unbelievable.

5. I have made an inventory of my false claims about the Bible.

6. I have made a list of those whom I led into confusion about the Bible.

7. I am willing to make amends to all those whom I may have led astray.

8. I realize that I have the inner power to restore sanity to my life and to search Scripture for the truth.

9. I will reach out to friends who can help me clarify my thinking about the Bible, God and Jesus.

10. I confess that only with God's help can my mind grasp the truth.

11. I will seek through prayer and meditation to improve my conscious contact with God, praying for knowledge of God's will for me and the power to carry that out.

12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these twelve steps, I will offer these steps to other former biblical fundamentalists.

These 12 steps are adapted from those of Alchoholics Anonymous.

from http://www.geocities.com/church_of_hank/fundamentalists_anonymous.html


JACK T CHICK TRACTS

{ 4:05 PM, 27/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

See real Chick tracts at http://www.chick.com/default.asp

HOWEVER ....................

I prefer the Jack T Chicky Parodies at http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/intro.html
Classics include "The Good, The Bad, and the Fundy"

Also visit:

1.

"Big Phony!" A spoof of a tract by two men who appear to love to hate evolution
http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/showquestion.asp?faq=4&fldAuto=46&page=2


2.
Enter The Jabberwock
http://www.enterthejabberwock.com/?cat=12

featuring ....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chick Dissection | In The Beginning

... Oh, great. Dinosaurs. And man. Coexisting. Again.

This is gonna be a blast! ....

....

"Your teacher's been brainwashed. By facts and observable evidence. That God, for whatever reason, lets him see instead of the apparent 'truth', which is something that can only be speculated about through blind faith, and that we can only really find out about when we die. Because nothing that we can observe in the world around us is trustworthy, and is potentially all just an illusion. Except the Bible. That's real. Because it says it is. There's no way it could possibly be a trick of Satan or anything. Because it says it's not. Really. But everything else in the whole world is potentially an illusion."

Scott Huse, huh? Yeah, I'll bet he's respected for his objectivity amongst the scientific community. Hey, a bunch of easily-led people agree that what he says sounds like it could make sense, so that makes him right, right? 'Cause that's what science is, right? Just a bunch of people making up stories and agreeing with each other without testing any evidence or doing comparative research?

....

I hate when people call science a "religion". It's not like there are a bunch of guys in robes praising idols of Einstein and Newton and such with necklaces made of strung-together test tubes. It's like saying that books are the "religion" of people who write, or that dishes are the "religion" of bus boys, or the internet is the "religion" of people who work for, say, Google. Like anyone who has the occupation of experimenting to observe evidence and better understand the world is only blindly worshipping like some kind of cult. ....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3.

Jack T. Chick Museum of Fine Art
http://members.aol.com/monsterwax/chick.html



An insight into the Fundamentalist mind

{ 1:35 PM, 23/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
For a Fiunmdamentalist to find out about a subject the fundamentalist must only ever read books written by those approved by one's church on the topic.  One doesn't go to the source of the knowledge because one might be contaminated by the secular humanist, new age, pagan writer who is not a fellow Fundamentalist. One also buys the book from one's local Trew Kristyun Bible & Assorted Kitsch Bookstore.

I've been looking for a cheap edition of a particular book by Soren Kierkegaard for a while.  Visiting friends in Sydney, my wife and I looked around the largest Christian bookstore in Sydney.  They had plenty of books ABOUT Kierkegaard ... telling how he was of the devil ... but not one single copy of anything that he wrote.

In their "Philospophy" section there were people like C S Lewis (an armchair philosopher and not particularly very good) and plenty of Fundamentalist foolosophers but not one single book by any philosopher that you would study at university.

A bookstore without real books!

I'm sure it's a policy to dumb people down in the current Fundamentalist Dark Age.



Why Did The Fundy Cross The Road?

{ 3:26 PM, 22/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }
1. He was following a trail of "Chick"  tracts.

2. She was going to meet her preacher at a motel over there and audition for a missionary position.

3. To buy his beer and porn, since none of his fellow church members lived on that side of town.

4. He wasn't sure why, so he stopped to pray about it and was hit by a church bus.

5. Because, there were two blacks and a jew walking on her side of the road.

6. Taking a short cut to a new sub-division, trying to beat the mormans and jehovah's witnesses to all those virgin doors.

7. He was trying to walk off a boner that had arose while watching "The Passion of the Christ" for the fourth time.

8. She was on her way to partake in one of fundyism's most holy of rituals at the "The Big Hair Beauty Shop".

9. He was walking back home after the bomb he was wearing failed to explode on the bus and he had only purchased a one way ticket.

10. She was taking a group of home schoolers on an educational field trip to an anti-abortion rally.

11. To lay hands on that dead possum and heal it, if not, he had take home for supper.

12. He was a black fundy walking home after a white fundy cab driver refused to stop and give him a ride.

13. I don't know, but it was a cross road, he stepped on a nail and suffered all the way home.

14. He could get a better view of the young, catholic, school girls in their little, short uniforms from over there.

15. He was trying to get back to his double parked cross before the meter maid could give him a ticket.

16. He was going over there to view a pile of stepped in dog shit, that was said to look like the face of Jesus Christ.

17. He was walking to McDonalds to apply for a job after the world failed to come to an end the day before, he had quit his job and signed his car and house over to his preacher.

18. I don't know, but it's dangerous as hell to cross a two lane road with blinders on.

19. He was leading his family to the church grounds for the unveiling of the new Strom Thurmond statue.

20. Because, the road took a LEFT turn.

21. He was trying to find that damn chicken and exorcise it, after he heard it was laying deviled eggs.

22. To find a better spot for his " I Hate Fags" sign.

23. I don't know why, but I'll bet he goes to hell for it.

24. He saw the sign that read "Cross Walk", and he wanted to walk in Jesus' footsteps.

25. She was taking the long way around the block to church, so all the neighbors could see her new easter clothes.

26. He was trying to catch that damn chicken, so his wife could cook it up for the preacher on sunday.

27. No reason.......No reason at all!

28. (Sing Along Now) HE SAW THE LIGHT, PRAISE THE LORD HE SAW THE LIGHT

from Christianity Revealed Web Site http://www.jdstone.org/cr

(Spelling corrected)



PASTOR DALE K WHANGKE - An awesome Blog!

{ 10:08 AM, 22/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

Visit My Christian Blog http://mypage.cooeey.com/mypage.asp?user=DaleKWhangke

Lots of pics

Lots of edifying sermons

This is an Aussie biblical true Christian anointed blog.

Have a look at my awesome ministry and my awesome church and my awesome biblical resources.  Totally awesome!

My church is also listed on the Stock Exchange.  Buy some shares!

Be blessed!
Pastor Dale K. Whangke

http://mypage.cooeey.com/mypage.asp?user=DaleKWhangke

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Life has been a diverse journey that has brought me here.

After leaving school in Cessnock, NSW at age 15 and some early work at McDonalds, the urge to travel came upon me. I went to Europe for a year traveling in a VW, exploring the Bible Belt in the USA.

On returning home I was employed for 10 years in the sewerage maintenance industry. I was married in 1981 to Glenda A. and in the next few years became the proud father of two beautiful twins - Dwayne O. and Dave D. During this time I began studying the bible through correspondence with the Tennessee Pentacostal True Bible College and received an Associate Certificate in Biblical Ministry.

During this time I have been confronted with all manner of need and began to seek ways to assist people on life's journey. I did studies in exorcism ministry and saw some wonderful results but not to the extent that I longed for. Then I felt the call to Christian ministry so my wife and family packed our possessions and moved to Maitland NSW. I am still ministering in Wyrst Pentacostal Church which I planted in 1992. In these past 10 years I have continued my ministry studies and now hold a PhD in Creation Science Studies.

All these studies have convinced me that people can make real and lasting change in their lives. We do not have to be governed by old thoughts and feelings.

I wish you well as you journey on to your destiny.

Be blessed!

Pastor Dale K. Whangke

http://mypage.cooeey.com/mypage.asp?user=DaleKWhangke



Bill Hicks

{ 8:36 AM, 22/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

The late comedian Bill Hicks used to say

'If you don't like what I say about God, then forgive me...'

Fundamentalists say:

'If we don't like what you say about God, then we'll burn you at the stake.'

As rare as a Fundamentalist who loves his enemy.

#################################################
... quoting from James Barr's book "Fundamentalism" on the three
distinguishing features of the Fundamentalist '... an assurance that those
who do not share their religious viewpoint are not really true Christians at
all.' - Peter Cameron "Heretic" (Doubleday; Sydney: 1994) p. 178
#################################################



Fundamentalist Christian Homeschooling

{ 4:15 PM, 21/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

My main views on homeschooling are summarised in this post.  I have helped many homeschoolers as a professional educator including loaning out school materials for their use and testing children.  I am totally opposed to poor education and the majority of homeschooling by fundamentalist Christians is poor education for the reasons given below.

As a professional teacher for 30 years (K-12 & adult) I had to fix up the kids who were homeschooled but their homeschooling had failed.  I am not the only professional teacher who has had to do the same thing!  Homeschooling works best when there are guidelines to follow that are set by professional educators and where the process is reviewed on a regular basis by professional educators. NSW, Australia has such a policy:
http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/  &
http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/ 

 

Note that ASSESSMENT & INSPECTIONS are MANDATORY!!!!!

****************************************************
from http://www.teachers.ash.org.au/aussieed/homeschooling.htm

NSW BOARD OF STUDIES
All applicants seeking registration for Home Education must satisfy the Minimum Curriculum Requirements.

*********************************************************

Many states in the USA have NO standard for homeschooling whatsoever. THEREIN IS THE PROBLEM!  If pseudo-science creationism can be taught as science in such homeschools then phrenology, blood letting, astrology, tarot card reading, etc etc etc can ALSO be taught as science.


#########################################################

HOMESKOOL MORONS USING THE CRAP BELOW TO INDOCRINATE THEIR CHILDREN IS A FORM OF CHILD ABUSE.

- Bob Jones University Press
- Pensacola Christian College (A Beka Books)
- Robinson Self-Teaching Home School Curriculum

Some of the very worst material to place anywhere near a child!

###############################################################
1. BOB JONES UNIVERSITY PRESS
################################################################

BJU Accreditation Through TRACS

Bob Jones University is a member of the Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools (TRACS) [PO Box 328, Forest, VA 24551; Telephone: 434.525.9539; email: i...@tracs.org] having been awarded Candidate status as a Category IV institution by the TRACS Accreditation Commission on April 6, 2005; this status is effective for a period of five years.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This actually doesn't mean much.  Bob Jones Uni is a fundamentalist creationist ratbag factory.  I quote from their associated site .... http://www.itib.org/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Testimony To An Infallable Bible

The church today is contending against an enemy-one cloaked in the guise of truth and relevance. Ecumenical alliances sound the siren song of unity, which in itself is desirable and biblical but frequently sacrifices biblical fidelity to reach that end. The emotionalism so prevalent in modern churches produces much heat but all too often neglects the light of God's Word. The secular world, with its seductive refrain of "tolerance" presents itself as compatible with biblical Christianity. The resurgence of Neo-Paganism and New Age ideologies promises greater peace and power, yet only echoes the age-old hollow promises Satan made to Eve. Now, more than ever, it is time to proclaim the profound differences between the counterfeits and the eternal truth of God's Word. This is what the International Testimony to an Infallible Bible (or "ITIB") is all about.

The ITIB started a number of years ago when several men were having dinner together while attending Bible Conference at Bob Jones University. In the course of the conversation, someone mentioned how timely it would be to have a congress which Fundamentalists from around the world could attend to receive inspiration, instruction, encouragement, and fellowship. A committee was formed, and in June of 1976 the World Congress of Fundamentalists was held in Edinburgh, Scotland. It was intended to be a one-time affair;
however, those who attended were so encouraged and blessed they requested that another such meeting be held.

Since that date over sixteen congresses (whether global or regional in scope) have been sponsored by the ITIB. The global or World Congresses are held about every ten years, while regional congresses are held every year or two in different locations around the globe.

The ITIB is co-chaired by Dr. Ian Paisley (member of the European Parliament; Pastor of Martyrs Memorial Free Presbyterian Church, Belfast, Northern Ireland) and Dr. Bob Jones III (President of Bob Jones University, Greenville, South Carolina, USA). The ITIB Committee is comprised of both ministers and laymen who meet occasionally to help guide the direction of the ITIB. Encouraging fidelity to the Bible is their overriding concern for
the ITIB.

It is amazing how far error, posing as truth, has advanced, taking control of so many churches and Christian institutions throughout the world. It is our prayer that the truth of biblical separation from all error, when understood and practiced by the pastors around the world, will reveal the dark and dangerous situation in which the church finds itself today.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What ratbaggery!!!!!!  There are many such "universities" in the USA and their "degrees" have no worth in Australia whatsoever!

###########################################################

2. A BEKA BOOKS

###########################################################

http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i29/29a04001.htm
From the issue dated March 24, 2006

A College That's Strictly Different

Secretive Pensacola Christian controls student life with tough regulations and unwritten rules

By THOMAS BARTLETT Pensacola, Fla.

...

Pensacola Christian College prides itself on being different, not just from secular colleges, but from fellow Christian ones, too.

.....

Lisa Morris was walking to class with her boyfriend last October when something happened. At first Ms. Morris, a sophomore music major, is reluctant to divulge the details. Eventually, however, the truth comes out: He patted her behind.

Someone who witnessed the incident reported Ms. Morris and her boyfriend. At Pensacola any physical contact between members of the opposite sex is forbidden. (Members of the same sex may touch, although the college condemns homosexuality.) The forbidden contact includes shaking hands and definitely includes patting behinds. Both students were expelled.
....
Even couples who are not talking or touching can be reprimanded. Sabrina Poirier, a student at Pensacola who withdrew in 1997, was disciplined for what is known on the campus as "optical intercourse" - staring too intently into the eyes of a member of the opposite sex. This is also referred to as "making eye babies." While the rule does not appear in written form, most students interviewed for this article were familiar with the concept.

.....

There are plenty of other ways to run afoul of the rules. Last spring Timothy Dow was caught playing the video game Halo 2. Such games are banned by the college. Movies are also forbidden, including those rated G. Music is restricted to classical or approved Christian ("contemporary Christian" artists are deemed too worldly). Students are allowed to watch television news at 6 o'clock, but that's it. The TVs are controlled by college employees, who flip a switch to black out the commercials, lest students see anything inappropriate.

In the library, books and magazines are censored. One student says she saw a pair of black-marker boxer shorts on a photograph of Michelangelo's David. Any books that students wish to read that are not in the library must first be approved by administrators. Those containing references to "magic," for instance, are normally rejected. The rule book specifically prohibits
"fleshly magazines and books."

......

Along with the college, Mr. Horton founded A Beka Books, acknowledged as the largest Christian-textbook company in the world. A Beka sells textbooks to more than 10,000 Christian schools across the country, offering a complete curriculum for kindergarten through 12th grade. It has also won a big share of the lucrative home-school market.

The company brings in about $70-million in annual revenue and is valued at $280-million, according to Dun & Bradstreet. A sizable chunk of that revenue goes to support the college, which does not come close to breaking even on its own. According to its 2003 tax filing, the university collected $20-million in tuition and fees and $3-million from contributions. The
filing attributes $15-million in income to "royalties," presumably from A Beka.

In the mid-90s, A Beka paid nearly $50-million in back taxes after the Internal Revenue Service ruled that it should have been classified as a for-profit entity. The college itself remains nonprofit.

Revenue from A Beka helps keep costs extremely low. Students pay $6,000 a year for tuition, room, and board. That's about a third or a quarter of what most other Christian colleges cost. When asked what other colleges they considered, Pensacola students often mention Bob Jones, Cedarville University, Northland Baptist Bible College, and Abilene Christian University. Cost is usually cited as the deciding factor.

Just as the textbook company helps support the college, the college helps support the textbook company. Many of Pensacola's students work for A Beka, operating binding equipment, packing books into boxes, loading those boxes onto forklifts. Some students complain about the working conditions; others say it's a good deal. For women, A Beka is usually the only employment option because they are not allowed to hold off-campus jobs. Or leave the campus alone, for that matter.

In the world of Christian colleges, Pensacola is an oddity. It is not a member of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. It has little to do with other institutions. Several administrators at other Christian colleges declined to discuss Pensacola on the record for fear of seeming critical. One said he did not know enough to speak knowledgeably because
Pensacola keeps mostly to itself.

While not wanting to criticize Pensacola, Carl A. Ruby, vice president for student life at Cedarville, in Ohio, emphasizes that his university doesn't take the "bad-kid approach" to discipline. "On major issues of Christian doctrine, we are probably always on the same page," he writes in an e-mail message. "In terms of living out our faith on a daily basis, significant
differences emerge."

....

Creationism is taught in science courses.

....

Several previously unaccredited Christian colleges, like Bob Jones, have recently become candidates for accreditation. Pensacola, however, has shown no interest in outside approval of any kind. Nor does it advertise its unaccredited status. A search of the Web site turns up no mention of accreditation. It is not mentioned in the college's viewbook either, which
dedicates four pages to sports activities and two to campus facilities.

....

Lack of accreditation has been a problem for Amy Brown, too. She graduated from Pensacola in 2003 with a degree in early-childhood education. But because the college is not accredited, she cannot teach in public schools, she says. She had no idea what accreditation was before enrolling at Pensacola. "I never tried to transfer," she writes in an e-mail message,
"because I had friends that did and ended up with all of their credits as electives," meaning that they had to retake required courses.

Mr. Ghobrial, the student from Egypt who doesn't mind the rules, wants to attend dental school. His first choice, West Virginia University, has already said it would not consider his application, because Pensacola is not accredited. "I'm hoping they change their minds," he says.

Many Christian colleges do accept Pensacola's credits, as do some secular institutions. Several former students say they have had no difficulty transferring credits or applying for jobs. But others have. And as more states crack down on degrees from unaccredited colleges, it may get even tougher for Pensacola graduates.

....

http://chronicle.com
Section: Students
Volume 52, Issue 29, Page A40

############################################################

> ROBINSON SELF-TEACHING HOME SCHOOL CURRICULUM

##############################################################

 

- TOTALLY dependent upon good literacy skills to begin with.
- Lock-step without any deviation from the program.
- 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica used - outdated and too complicated for younger readers
- 1913 Webster's Dictionary used - outdated and too complicated for younger readers
- Science texts instead of hands on experimentation and disvcovery learning.
- Original King James Version of the Bible - outdated and language too complicated for any child of any age
-Phonics only without the addition of  whole language approach, etc.
- Claims to be "self-teaching" but pupils require interaction with at least one other person - a teacher.

This "box:" is the lazy person's way of homeschooling and not worth the money you will outlay for it.

Visit the utter shite at http://www.robinsoncurriculum.com/view/rc/s31p45.htm

##########################################################

Fundamentalism & homeschooling - "Little Ones To Him Belong" from

"THE FUNDAMENTALS OF EXTREMISM - The Christian Right in America"
Edited by Kimberly Blaker New Boston Books, Inc. Michigan 2003
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LITTLE ONES TO HIM BELONG

by Bobbie Kirkhart p. 48 ff

Our goal is not to make the schools better. . . . the goal is to hamper them, so they cannot grow. . . . Our goal as God-fearing, uncompromised . .. Christians is to shut down the public schools . . . step by step, school by school, district by district.132

Robert Thoburne in The Children Trap

.....

fundamentalist responses are largely divided into attempts to control their own children's education, and attempts to control all children's education.

....

Still, the typical home schooling parent is white, Protestant, with above-average income and education. When only one reason for home schooling is elicited, the most common reason for the decision is the importance home schooling parents put in religious education. One might expect virtually all home schooling parents include in their reasoning they believe they can
provide a better education. Interestingly, in a 1999 survey, although this was the most popular reason cited, it was included by slightly fewer than half of the parents. This is in spite of more than one answer being allowed.  Religion was a close second at thirty-eight percent, and undoubtedly overlapped the fifteen percent who chose character building and the twelve
percent who objected to what the school teaches.185

While home schooling parents' education is usually above the average,186 in only ten states are parents required to have a high school diploma or general equivalency diploma to home school. It has been found that almost nineteen percent of home schooling parents did not finish high school.187

There is no question home schooled children may do well academically. Homeschooling proponents point to the large percentage of spelling bee and geography champions who have been home schooled. Unfettered by curriculum mandates, those parents whose ambition for their children lies in these subjects have a huge advantage in home schooling. It is more difficult to make sense of the "average," however. Proponents point to relatively high
percentiles on SAT and ACT scores, and on various "norming" tests. Indeed, they are impressive, but they reflect a selfselected minority of home-schooled students.
....
Among educators and child development specialists, the biggest concern with home schooling is the lack of social experience, both inside and outside the classroom. Many home schoolers form collectives for providing enrichment activities, such as field trips, and enter their children in such things as group dance class or group sports. But the interaction provided is structured and controlled, lacking the diversity the child will face in the workforce and without even the limited freedom of speech and association present in the high school hallway.

Many home schooling parents see this as an advantage. But if it is an advantage, it is not one an adult can maintain and still enjoy the full mobility, cultural opportunity, and freedom our society has to offer.

 

Educators point out peer interaction is a valuable and necessary component of a good academic lesson plan. Class discussion, oral reports, and cooperative learning assignments such as small group projects are important segments of the modern classroom day. Most teachers consider them vital to a total educational experience. Some of the reasons this is true may in fact be among fundamentalists' objections to public education. Peer interaction
increases creativity and critical thinking skills. It is a teacher's job to tell the students what is required, so students may meet the expectations. But when one is trying to please fellow students, there is no clear line, no "this is the answer they want" to seek. In class discussion, students have some social protection if they want to question the authority of the teacher's statement or the instructional materials. This is a practice good teachers encourage, as it forces the student to look critically at the issues and take ownership of his or her own ideas.
....
Typical fundamentalist home schooling parents have taken their children out of school as much to protect them from learning which they consider harmful, as to instill religious values. This greatly decreases what the parent needs to know. Certainly, in the field of biology, the debate is well known. Without evolution, any real understanding of DNA is not important. Teaching it in depth might lead the child to conclude the evolutionists are right.

The typical public high school literature class includes work encouraging students to think beyond the cliché, and to question traditional values. This is not as much to get students to change their values, but so that they will know why they hold them. To the fundamentalist, all values are prescribed in the Bible, as explained by some earthly authority.

Questioning them is sacrilege. Neither William Shakespeare nor Toni Morrison fit in this scheme. Literature can go as far as oversimplified  interpretations of Milton and Blake.189 ncient history must be shaped to conform to Biblical accounts, and merican history is distorted into an account of a struggle to establish and maintain a Christian religion. Any serious study of ancient India or of America's Founding Fathers calls these standards into question. Indeed, many fundamentalists claim the Founding Fathers were Christian, in spite of a clear record that the majority of the most prominent were not.

Other social sciences have to include the concepts homosexuality is a sin, anti-social behavior is inspired by Satan, and people who have not heard the word of Jesus are culturally deficient. This, then, excludes much of the traditional teaching of the courses that might call the entire belief system  into question. Therefore, fundamentalist children are left with very primitive concepts of biology and physics, with-if the parent can teach it-some chemistry, though much organic chemistry is suspect.

Mathematics does present a real problem. Though its applications are often considered sinful, it is not philosophically excluded from the fundamentalist curriculum. New math, where children are taught to use critical thinking skills, rather than just the mechanics, is typically
avoided.

However, at the higher levels, the math is beyond most parents' abilities. Health class, of course, excludes any in-depth study of the human reproductive system and certainly of birth control. It may also well omit common psychological issues, such as depression.

Finally, Bible study is important to the fundamentalist curriculum, but study here may be a misnomer. The fundamentalists' assertion they take the Bible literally, without need for interpretation, belies the internal contradictions within the collection. So, even Bible study, in addition to lacking any critical analysis, is inadequate in significant detail.

 

Fundamentalists teach the story of Jesus' resurrection as history. Yet, they cannot teach the contradictory events and time lines of the various versions without adding explanations that defy both logic and Biblical scholarship.

It is no surprise fundamentalists are less likely than the general population to obtain a college education. Sociologists Alfred Darnell and Darren Sherkat reveal fundamentalists were found to "have significantly lower educational attainment in 1973 and 1982" than others. They are also less likely to take college preparatory classes and have lower educational
aspirations.190

Fundamentalists are also often opposed to colleges, because they see Christians lose their faith with higher education. By not obtaining a higher education, fundamentalists never learn to think critically about religion, politics, and social issues. This leads to mental stagnation in many areas, and therefore, such problems cannot be resolved.191



The Bible as the Golden Calf of Fundamentalism

{ 10:57 AM, 20/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

> The "Book" has become a Golden Calf of its own making.. thanks to fundamentalists.

Aw, but the widdle Fundies like their widdle Golden Calf idol.  It looks so pretty ... and it comes in a Trew Kristyun version that you can supersize with added fries (in Hell).

We luv you Bible
Oh yes we doooooooooooooooooooooooo
We luv you Bible
And we'll be Troooooooooooooooooooooo  Kristyuns!

 

"FUNDAMENTALISTS - The arseholes in the Body of Christ"

The methane gas from Fundamentalist bullshit has probably caused the hole in the ozone layer all by itself.

"Sheep shit on shepherd's shoes, by any other name, still stinks." (paraphrasing Bono)

 



WILL for those about to be raptured

{ 10:47 AM, 18/2/2007 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

Trew Kristyun spellun left intact. ;-) ........

 

from http://www.nonraptured.com/will.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Inherting from the Raptured

If we put our minds to it, most of us know someone who is fairly certain they'll be raptured. They may not be considering this, but why not leave all their earthly belongings to you -- their nonraptured friend -- rather than letting them fall through to a worldwide government run by The Beast and Satan's minions? You do not even need to be that close if much of this
person's family will be raptured with them.

Contact your saintly friends now. Offer to let them use the convenient form below to keep their fiscal assets from slipping into the hands of Satan's One World Government agents.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


                 LAST WILL OF _________________ [name of testator]



I, _________________ [name of testator], a resident of _________________,

[State], being of sound and disposing mind and memory, fully accepting

the Lord Jesus Christ as my lord and savior, and  not being actuated by

any duress, menace, fraud, mistake, or undue influence Satanic or

otherwise, do make, publish, and declare this to be my last Will, ereby

expressly revoking all Wills and Codicils previously made by me.



I. EXECUTOR:  I appoint _________________ as Executor of this my Last

Will and Testament and provide if this Executor is unable or unwilling

to serve (or quite unexpectedly raptured) then I appoint _____________

as alternate heathen Executor.  My Executor shall be authorized to carry

out all provisions of this Will and pay my just debts, obligations and

funeral expenses. I further provide my Executor shall not be required to

post surety bond in this or any other jurisdiction, and direct that no

expert appraisal be made of my estate unless required The Beast.







II. GUARDIAN: In the event I shall be taken to Jesus as the sole parent

of minor children too sinful to be raptured, then I appoint ____________

Guardian of said minor children. If this named Guardian is unable or

unwilling to serve, then I appoint _________________ alternate.



III.  MARITAL STATUS:  I declare that I am married to _________________

[name of spouse ] and that all references in this Will to my

_________________ [Husband or wife] are references to _________________

[him or her].



IV.  SIMULTANEOUS RAPTURE OF SPOUSE:  In the event that my ____________

[wife or husband] shall be raptured with me or there is no direct

evidence to establish that my _________________ [wife or husband] and I

are just hidinng pretending to have been taken with saints, I direct that

I shall be deemed to have predeceased/preascended my _________________

[wife or husband], notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary,

and that the provisions of my Will shall be construed on such presumption.



V.  SIMULTANEOUS DEATH OF BENEFICIARY:  If any beneficiary of this Will,

including any beneficiary of any trust established by this Will, other

than my _________________ [wife or husband], shall die or, against the

indications of their current lives, actually be raptured with we saints,

within 60 days of my rapture or prior to the distribution of my estate,

I hereby declare that I shall be deemed to have survived such person.



VI. BEQUESTS:













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, _________________ [name of testator ], hereby set

my hand to this last Will, on each page of which I have placed my

initials, on this _________________ day of _________________, at

_________________, [State].



_________________ [signature ]

_________________ [typed name of testator ]



The foregoing instrument [, consisting of _________________ pages,

including this page,] was signed in our presence by _________________

[name of testator ] and declared by _________________ [him or her] to

be _________________ [his or her] last Will. We, at the request and in

the presence of _________________ [him or her] and in the presence of

each other, do hereby state that we are infidels and/or iniquitous to

an extent to which we may be assured of being nonraptured, and have

subscribed our names below as witnesses on this _________________ day

of _________________.



_________________ [Signature of Infidel Witness #1]

_________________ [Typed name of Infidel Witness #1]

_________________ [Address of WInfidel itness #1]





_________________ [Signature of Infidel Witness #2]

_________________ [Typed name of Infidel Witness #2]

_________________ [Address of Infidel Witness #2]





_________________ [Signature of Infidel Witness #3]

_________________ [Typed name of Infidel Witness #3]

_________________ [Address of Infidel Witness #3]


 



{ Last Page } { Page 1 of 3 } { Next Page }

About Me

Home
My Profile
Archives
Friends
My Photo Album
Podcast Files

«  November 2008  »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12
3456789
1011121314