MarkT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fundamentalism is a RECENT human inventionc. 4 BC Birth of Jesus... 70 Fall of Jerusalem ... 202 Christians persecuted under Septimus Severus 211 Christians tolerated under Emperor Antoninus Caracalla 222 Christians favored Emperor Alexander Severus 230 Origen's On First Principles 235 Christians persecuted under Emperor Maximin the Thracian 238 Christians tolerated under Emperor Gordian III 244 Christians favored under Emperor Philip the Arabian 251 Cyprian's Unity of the Catholic Church 254 Death of Origen 303 Diocletian orders burning of Christian books and churches 312 Emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity 313 Edict of Milan establishes official toleration of Christianity 325 Council of Nicea 336 Death of Constantine 354 Birth of Augustine 367 Athanasius lists all 27 books of NT 379 Basil the Great dies 380 Christianity made official religion of Roman Empire 381 Council of Constantinople 386 Augustine converts to Christianity 389 Gregory of Nazianzus dies 395 Gregory of Nyssa dies c. 400 Jerome's Vulgate (translation of the Greek Bible into Latin) 407 John Chrysostom dies 411 Council of Carthage condemns Donatists 417 Pope Innocent I condemns Pelagianism 420 Death of Jerome 430 Death of Augustine 431 Council of Ephesus 451 Council of Chalcedon 787 Second Council of Nicea 950 Olga of Russia converts to Christianity 1054 Great Schism between East and West 1093 Anselm becomes Archbishop of Canterbury 1095 Council of Clermont: Pope Urban II proclaims First Crusade 1098 Crusaders take Antioch from Turks 1099 Crusaders recapture Jerusalem from Turks 1122 Concordat of Worms 1141 Peter Abelard condemned 1144 Fall of Edessa (crusader state) 1187 Fall of Jerusalem to Turks 1215 Fourth Lateran Council 1309 "Babylonian Captivity" (until 1377) 1337 Hundred Years' War (until 1453) 1378 Great Western Schism (until 1423) 1409 Council of Pisa 1413-14 Lollard rebellion 1415 Council of Constance. Martyrdom of Jan Hus. 1420 Crusade against Hussites 1431 Joan of Arc martyred 1431-49 Council of Basel 1438-45 Council of Ferrara-Florence 1453 Fall of Constantinople to Turks 1478 Spanish Inquisition founded by Ferdinand and Isabella 1483 Birth of Martin Luther 1492 Expulsion of Jews from Spain by Ferdinand and Isabella 1505 Luther becomes a monk ############################# PROTESTANTISM BEGINS ############################# 1517 Luther posts 95 Theses 1521 Luther excommunicated 1530 Augsburg Confession 1534 Henry VIII's Act of Supremacy 1536 Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion 1541 Colloquy of Regensburg 1555 Peace of Augsburg 1559 Elizabeth I's Act of Uniformity 1590 Michelangelo completes the dome of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome 1609 Baptist Church founded by John Smyth 1611 King James (Authorized) Version of the Bible produced 1729 Beginnings of Methodism, led by John Wesley 1738 John Wesley feels his "heart strangely warmed" during a reading of Luther's preface to Romans on Aldersgate Street in London 1775 American Wars of Independence begin 1783 America wins independence from Britain 1793 Louis XVI executed 1797 Second Awakening begins 1798 Pope Pius VI is prisoner of France 1799 Schleiermacher writes Speeches 1801 Cane Ridge Revival 1804 Napoleon becomes emperor 1807 Hegel writes Phenomenology of the Spirit 1808 French occupy Rome 1810 Mexico wins independence 1812-14 British-American War 1814 Reorganization of the Jesuits 1816 American Bible Society established 1822 Schleiermacher writes Christian Faith 1826 American Society for the Promotion of Temperance founded 1830 Joseph Smith produces Book of Mormon 1834 Spanish Inquisition officially abolished 1838 Abolition of slavery in the British Caribbean 1841 David Livingstone to Africa 1845 Methodists and Baptists split over the issue of slavery 1846 Pope Pius IX (until 1878) 1854 Dogma of Immaculate Conception of Mary 1859 Darwin publishes Origin of the Species 1861-65 American Civil War 1861 Presbyterians divide over the issue of slavery 1869 First Vatican Council 1870 Dogma of Papal Infallibility 1872 Moody begins preaching 1875 Mary Baker Eddy writes Science and Health 1882 Neitzsche declares "God is dead" ####################################### FUNDAMENTALISM BEGINS ###################################### 1895 Five Fundamentals 1900 Freud's Interpretation of Dreams 1906 Azusa Street revival 1908 Henry Ford introduces the Model T 1910 World Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1914 Assemblies of God founded 1914-18 World War I 1917 Russian Revolution 1919 Prohibition passed into law 1925 Scopes "Monkey" trial 1932 Barth's Church Dogmatics 1939 Hitler invades Poland and sparks WWI 1945 Nag Hammadi Library discovered in Egypt; US drops atomic bombs on Japan 1947 India wins independence from U.K. 1948 World Council of Churches founded 1950 Papal encyclical Humani generis 1956 First issue of Christianity Today 1960 Birth control pill approved by FDA 1961 First human in space Papal encyclical Mater et Magistra 1962-65 Second Vatican Council 1963 MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech 1968 Papal encyclical Humanae vitae 1969 First man on the moon 1971 Intel introduces the microprocessor 1973 Roe vs. Wade 1987-88 Televangelist scandals 1989 First woman ordained in an apostolic-succession church (the Protestant Episcopal church). Fall of the Berlin Wall. 1997 Birth of the internet from http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/timeline.htm American Fundamentalists: Their Identification, Traits, and Proper MockeryAmerican Fundamentalists: Their Identification, Traits, and Proper MockeryBy Michael Created 03/06/2008 - 00:33 By Jeff Gustafson Contrary to media representation, North American evangelicalism is by no means the reflection of a single monolithic mentality. As the icy clutch of diversity continues to wring dry the neck of the once predictably Bible-thumpin', gay-bashin', infomercial givin' hegemony of the evangelical church, it has been forced to accommodate a number of lifestyles and cultures, none of which are particularly interesting. Still, spotting them in the wild can be a dicey business. Here is each, according to their kind. OLD-SCHOOL FUNDIES Identification: As the name implies, this is the class of evangelical that has changed the least since America's founding. They are mostly relegated to the South, but with healthy distributions in the Midwest and Appalachian regions, always in secluded areas. They are distinguished from other groups mainly by their primitiveness and their tendency to spit a lot while preaching. Forget televangelist sheen; these guys are the genuine article, and as such are often disheveled and unwashed. (Fig 1.1) They tend to have large, bulbous eyes, particularly when they're describing something from Revelation. Don't be surprised if they've got a couple snakes hanging on them. Oh, and guns. Lots of 'em. Beliefs: Imagine the most seriously out-to-lunch ramblings of Pat Robertson, or that guy who has that half-hour show on the end times on UPN, and multiply it by ten. The ones that can read disagree with the theology of the Left Behind series, but only because it isn't wacky enough. James Dobson's claim that SpongeBob Squarepants supports the homosexual agenda is insufficient-they cannot fathom a popular children's character who doesn't support homosexuals, although their knowledge of cartoons is strictly limited to hearsay, as none of them own TVs. In terms of the Bible, they tend towards the sections that have God doing awesomely violent things while including the Jesus stuff more or less as a concession. If you suggest that perhaps the gospel accounts of Jesus don't always give an entirely historical portrait, they'll probably set you on fire. Evangelical Style: Turn or burn. Old-school fundies tend to be direct, and prefer to tell you that you're going to hell to your face rather than through the filter of TV or radio (neither of which they know how to operate). They can be seen on college campuses or metropolitan areas making a dramatic case for the Lord's judgment, frequently using a homemade pedestal. This strikes people as cute and, in a hilarious misunderstanding of the intent, they will often leave spare change. Political Views: Politics are too much of an "of this world" thing for the old-school fundie, so there is not much light to be shed in this section. Even Christian "hot-button" issues like abortion and gay marriage don't sway them (aside from the occasional clinic bomber), since their extreme zealotry leads them to believe that even Bush is a rabid sodomite. A unique quality of old-school fundies that could be construed as "progressive" is the fact that they are about as likely to be black as white (KKK not included). Musical Taste: You can never go wrong with old hymns, but I would submit that more of them are into death metal than is commonly thought. How to Tame an Old-School Fundie: Tell him that your favorite part of Revelation is when the flying scorpions come to eat away at the unbelievers. Be prepared for him to recite the rest of Revelation by memory. Make sure there are no snakes on him before you make bodily contact. If social niceties are out of the question, just shoot him before he shoots you. MAINSTREAM FUNDIES This class of evangelical is the kind which the media portrays most accurately, which is fitting, since they are the most media-savvy. They have much in common with their cousin the Old-School Fundie, but they are far better dressed, are perhaps not quite so vitriolic in their preaching, and have heard of the Internet. They can be found anywhere, but spotting them in the wild is greatly simplified if you happen to know where the homosexual agenda will hit next (Fig. 1.2); they await its strike like a reactionary mongoose on its guard against a hypnotically amoral cobra. The main point of divergence between old-school and mainstream fundies is in appearance. They tend to favor the televangelist look for the men, conservative dresses for the women. They don't carry around guns, but they have their Bible, and they will fire with a rifleman's zeal. Beliefs: The Bible is the infallible word of God. Every species of evangelical will have some kind of statement to this effect, but they all have to gay it up with their appeals to cultural context, proper hermeneutical method, and the lexical-syntactical method, whatever that is. They are the truest, bluest form of Biblical literalists, though they probably won't set you on fire, unless you ask them to. They are comfortable with a Left Behind level of nuttiness in interpreting the end times, and they are the only known evangelical species to admit to enjoying the Book of Leviticus. They're way more into Jesus than their more primitive brethren, often pronouncing his name in three syllables ("Juh-EEZ-suss!") to fully express their piety. Christ is the savior of the world, but He gives preferential treatment to Americans-specifically, American Christians-so that they will not have to be challenged with multiculturalism or slight lifestyle changes ("persecution") in the pursuit of ultimate comfort . er, holiness. Evangelical Style: Despite their uncanny ability to embarrass themselves, mainstream fundies maintain an imaginary public dignity that disallows them from embracing the Turn-or-Burn approach directly. They prefer catchy mantras like "The Condom Nation will receive Condemnation," or "Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve," or "Keep your laws off my body"1 [1], and they have been known to make subtle hints that God will bring natural disaster on schools that vote against teaching intelligent design. They tend to at least generate a conversational tone before they start preaching at you, and they appeal just as much to God's love for you as to His unquenchable wrath. Since so much of their ministry revolves around politics, getting you to vote for whoever they support on the tracts they send you is seen as akin to saving your soul. Still, winning you over for Christ is their ultimate goal, and they'll be the first to tell you that it would break their heart to see you with the mark of the Beast on your forehead when the Judgment comes. Political Views: This is the group that spawned the Moral Majority and Christian Coalition. They're sane enough to fit into the normal political spectrum, but only just. They don't "hate" gays, but they DO think that the gays have a vampiric lust to feed on the lifeblood of our children's moral groundings. What's more, most of them read and agree with Ann Coulter, even those who don't still think she's "on the right track." Their contempt for public schools is second only to those who attend public schools. Most mainstream fundies homeschool their kids, all the while fighting for the inalienable rights of prayer, Bible indoctrination, and the stoning of adulterous teachers within the secularized walls of the Damned. Back in their heyday (which may still be now, for all anyone knows or cares), the Christian Coalition would send out flyers to their perceived constituencies that detailed the positions that various candidates held on key issues. Did they sanction the killing of children? Were they capable of spinning any left-leaning rhetoric of their opponent as anti-Christian? And most importantly, were they possessed by Satan? All these and more were given carefully thought-out answers by God's chosen people, that whosoever should believe in them uncritically should not perish, but have everlasting voting power (Gospel of Pat Robertson, verse 16). Musical Taste: For this part, it's easier to go by what they disapprove of. They hate anything on secular radio, including Radio Disney, since we all know whose agenda Disney supports. They have been known to flog their children for watching MTV (one of the few things that qualifies them as decent parents), and even that stuff on the local Christian station is getting a bit too edgy, what with the electric guitar and all. How to Tame a Mainstream Fundie: Tell them to shut up. Their indignation at this will manifest itself in an involuntary geyser of half-baked rhetoric about how the persecution of Christians is what's sending America into the abyss and the separation of church and state is just a secular myth and so forth. I guess you can't really "tame" a mainstream fundie, you can just get them to ramble incessantly, which will at best put them in a sort of trance. Our best field naturalists are still working on this one. 1The notion that this originated with pro-choice feminists is false. It was principally a mantra used by public-school attending children of mainstream fundies, whose parents' zeal for seeing the 10 commandments displayed in the public arena was made manifest by the branding of 1-10 of the commandments on their children's backs. This would mark the first-and last-time that feminists would ever borrow a slogan from evangelically parented schoolchildren. From http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/american-fundamentalists Ten Verses Never Preached OnTen Verses Never Preached OnWritten Dec 5th, 2006 by Josh Rives ... 10. 2 Kings 2:23-24 NKJV Then he went up from there to Bethel; and as he was going up the road, some youths came from the city and mocked him, and said to him, "Go up, you baldhead! Go up, you baldhead!" So he turned around and looked at them, and pronounced a curse on them in the name of the LORD. And two female bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the youths. Comments: George Costanza envokes the wrath of God. 9. Mark 14:51-52 NASB A young man was following Him, wearing nothing but a linen sheet over his naked body; and they seized him. But he pulled free of the linen sheet and escaped naked. Comments: Possibly the first streaker in history. 8. Deuteronomy 23:1 ESV No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall enter the assembly of the Lord. Comments: We can't just be letting anyone in. We have to draw the line somewhere. 7. Genesis 38:8-10 NASB Then Judah said to Onan, "Go in to your brother's wife, and perform your duty as a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother." Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so when he went in to his brother's wife, he wasted his seed on the ground in order not to give offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of the LORD; so He took his life also. Comments: Not only do you have to carry the body out, but you have to mop the floor too. 6. 1 Samuel 18:25-27 ESV Then Saul said, "Thus shall you say to David, 'The king desires no bride-price except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, that he may be avenged of the king's enemies.'" Now Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law. Before the time had expired, David arose and went, along with his men, and killed two hundred of the Philistines. And David brought their foreskins, which were given in full number to the king, that he might become the king's son-in-law. And Saul gave him his daughter Michal for a wife. Comments: How do you present a gift like that? Do you tie a bow on the box? 5. Exodus 4:24-25 NASB Now it came about at the lodging place on the way that the LORD met him and sought to put him to death. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin and threw it at Moses' feet, and she said, "You are indeed a bridegroom of blood to me." Comments: I imagine the son was screaming in pain and Moses just kinda stared at it in disgust. 4. Ezekiel 16:17 NIV You also took the fine jewelry I gave you, the jewelry made of my gold and silver, and you made for yourself male idols and engaged in prostitution with them. Comments: What did she do with her gold and silver idols? 3. Ezekiel 23:19-20 NET Yet she increased her prostitution, remembering the days of her youth when she engaged in prostitution in the land of Egypt. She lusted after their genitals as large as those of donkeys, and their seminal emission was as strong as that of stallions. Comments: Can't wait to hear this taught from a pulpit. 2. Judges 3:19-25 ESV And Ehud reached with his left hand, took the sword from his right thigh, and thrust it into his belly. And the hilt also went in after the blade, and the fat closed over the blade, for he did not pull the sword out of his belly; and the dung came out. Comments: Apparently the sword pierced all the way through and something unexpected came out the other side. The author felt this was a necessary detail to include. 1. Deuteronomy 25:11-12 NASB If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity. from http://www.churchhopping.com/ten-verses-never-preached-on/ BRead Of Life"Allan Svensson" <allan-sv@algonet.se> wrote:> God's word is the Bread of Life I suggest shipping bibles out to every poor household so that they can eat their bibles instead of food. Can anyone give me the nutritional breakdown of a bible sans fibre? Death Certificate - "Taken By The Lord"Trew Kristyuns (as I was told by a Trew Kristyun couple quoting Psalm 91)get taken by "the Lord" and don't actually die from any known cause. The Death Certificate must read "Taken by the Lord" for every Trew Kristyun. ;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Psalm 91 (New International Version) 1 He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty. [a] 2 I will say [b] of the LORD, "He is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust." 3 Surely he will save you from the fowler's snare and from the deadly pestilence. 4 He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart. 5 You will not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day, 6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness, nor the plague that destroys at midday. 7 A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you. 8 You will only observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked. 9 If you make the Most High your dwelling- even the LORD, who is my refuge- 10 then no harm will befall you, no disaster will come near your tent. 11 For he will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways; 12 they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone. 13 You will tread upon the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the serpent. 14 "Because he loves me," says the LORD, "I will rescue him; I will protect him, for he acknowledges my name. 15 He will call upon me, and I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him. 16 With long life will I satisfy him and show him my salvation." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Top 10 Political Activities of Fundamentalists10. Restrict the teaching of science to help indoctrinate non-Christian children in public schools. 9. Pressure people to say under God during the pledge. Use this pledge to claim atheists aren't citizens. 8. Stop scientific and medical research deemed offensive to their religion. 7. Censor books offensive to their faith. 6. Pass anti-gay legislation. 5. Use the taxpayer dollars, including those contributed by non-Christians, to fund religious monuments. 4. Legislate morality, forcing other citizens to conform to Christian standards. 3. Give taxpayer dollars to faith-based charities that promote Christianity. 2. Move the country closer to Christian theocracy. ...and the #1 political activity of Fundamentalist Christians... 1. Whine endlessly about how oppressed Christians are in this country. from http://www.godvsthebible.com/top10list3.htm V. Sexual Roots of the Fundamentalist Psyche "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVISJanuary 8 / 9, 2005Bible Says The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism By WALTER A. DAVIS "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against." Kenneth Burke .... V. Sexual Roots of the Fundamentalist Psyche ... Fundamentalists live in a world obsessed with sexuality. It provides the primary texts of Biblical citation. It's the concrete referent of the fulminations against secularism, secular humanism, post-modernism, ethical relativism, feminism, deconstructionism, etc. It's also what the vaunted claim of "moral values" is all about. Morality is not about a life of charity, or the pursuit of justice, or the opening of oneself to the depth of human suffering. It's about avoiding certain sexual sins and fixating on that dimension of life to the virtual exclusion of everything else. Battling sex is apparently what life is all about as if the primary plan of the creator were to put us on earth so that we'll be tempted by that in us that we must condemn in order to win salvation. By the same token, each new scandal reveals the consequences of sexual repression: the brutal abuse of young boys by a legion of pedophile priests; the sexual license of Jim Jones and David Koresh; the sadomasochistic bondage rituals that Jimmy Swaggart significantly could only enact with prostitutes; the epidemic of physical, sexual, and psychological abuse that is the untold story of the fundamentalist family. The repression of sexuality has as a necessary consequence the brutalization of the other. All such phenomena are variations on the same tired story. Sexual repression breeds foul imaginings. Which of necessity fixate on the sexual. What has been rendered foul within runs amuck in the world. Following the dictates of a punitive super-ego the psyche becomes obsessed with the attack on sexuality. The purpose is to render evil virtually everything connected with sex until life itself is reduced to an allegory in which the battle of good and evil is all about the temptations of the flesh, as if nothing else in life matters so complete is the vindictive fixation of the Deity on the human genitals. ... Because it poses a comprehensive threat to the fundamentalist project eros must be poisoned at early as possible. Ironically there is, however, only one way this project can succeed. Through love. To summarize briefly a concept I've developed at length elsewhere, parenting is the act through which the parent's conscious and unconscious conflicts and desires become the psyche of the child. This transmission is the act through which the child's psyche is born. The child's unconditional love is the condition that makes it all possible. To put it in more concrete terms, from an early age one must be indoctrinated by those one trusts and loves in the primary lesson: that obedience is the price one must pay to retain love. And so deep must become one's need for this love that one becomes willing to make any sacrifice it requires. ... The goal of fundamentalist child-rearing is to create a subject preoccupied with waging war on itself, with battling against its own desires under the gaze of a judgmental, punitive super-ego. [4] ... What else could child-rearing be for the parents but the chance to prove themselves to the Lord by taking whatever measures are required to assure that His commands assume total control over the child's psyche. Getting the child to internalize a super-ego that makes guilt over one's desires the primary relationship the subject has to itself assumes in fundamentalism the status of a categorical imperative. Life must be filled up with inhibitions and prohibitions in order to assure that sexuality will always be experienced as a fall into sin. Internally that experience is guaranteed by the condition that lays in wait to assault the transgressive psyche, even when the transgression is only in thought or fantasy. Transgression, one discovers, floods the psyche with guilt, shame, and the conviction of a fundamental badness that can only be purged by an attack on oneself. ... Sexuality has been transformed into the festering wound out of which resentment is born. For every time desire rises up one experiences again one's powerlessness to break the strangle-hold the super-ego has over one's sexuality. A jaundiced eye then casts its gaze on all who have succeeded where one failed Envy rises up, offering one the only exit from inner conflict--hatred of the sexual and an unending war upon it. That war has become one's deepest necessity. Envy begets hatred begets rage. The only way to relieve that rage is by projecting it onto the world. That act has an added charm: it is the way one achieves identification with that super-ego that has never stopped assaulting one from within. As avenging angel damning a sinful world one reclaims as resentment what one has had to sacrifice as desire. The transformation is complete. One is no longer a child tortured into submission by a punitive super-ego. One has become an adult projecting that destructiveness upon the world. ... .... Equally misplaced is the attempt to confine fundamentalism to preachers in the Bible-belt. Fundamentalism is on the rise today and takes many forms because it speaks to something that has long been active in Christianity, something that the old Church exemplified and that we may find impossible to expunge from Judeo-Christianity in general because the truth of the matter is the existence of a contiuum that finds fundamentalism in the position of the Hegelian Notion, the telos and immanent logos that develops through the course of Judeo-Christianity until it achieves in fundamentalism its proper and final form. ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University. He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu. from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html IV. Apocalypticism-The Heart of the Ulcer "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVISJanuary 8 / 9, 2005Bible Says The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism By WALTER A. DAVIS "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against." Kenneth Burke ... IV. Apocalypticism-The Heart of the Ulcer "Devout believers are safeguarded in a high degree against the risk of certain neurotic illnesses; their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing the personal one." Freud Apocalypticism is the capstone that completes the process of fundamentalist self-fashioning. Without it, as we'll see, the entire edifice would crumble. ... In the Apocalyptic fantasm an ultimate expression is given to the conflicts that define the fundamentalist psyche through an action that brings an end to those conflicts. The necessity of Apocalypticism is a direct outgrowth of the psychological mechanism on which fundamentalist relies to structure the world. The only way to prevent a return of the projections is through a final evacuation. This desire can only come to fruition with the picturing of a world beyond redemption held under the brand of an all-consuming wrath. That image finalizes the split that defines the psyche by giving sublime expression to the way one must view the world when seeing it from the standpoint of one's salvation. Apocalypticism thus brings to completion the psychological operation that has been employed repeatedly from the beginning. First, one cleanses oneself by projecting one's disowned desires unto the world. The resulting split must then be maintained rigorously with nothing allowed to fall outside its scope. The psyche must be voided of everything save the serenities of the saved. For that to happen, however, the world must become the object of an unstinting attack on all that one has externalized there. This act must be endless lest the projections return. By its internal logic fundamentalism is thus driven ineluctably to a need for quantitative expansion through the discovery of greater, more insidious forms of evil. The mathematical sublime beckons, the need to produce greater and greater magnitudes. The world becomes the polluted chamber of one's foulest imaginings with no way to check the demands of that vision. Within the psyche an even greater transformation occurs. One craves the constant exercise of an emotion that one must just as strenuously disclaim. Hatred. One needs fresh supplies of it as badly as the U.S. needs to ransack the globe for fresh supplies of oil. No matter how loudly one proclaims one's salvation, purified in the blood of the lamb, hatred has become the innermost necessity to which one is wedded. And that necessity has now broken lose of any containment. Hatred of one's former self is no longer sufficient. One now hates the world and is driven to seek out everything in it that one can claim caused or can cause an inner condition other than the purity of the saved. One hates, that is, everything that resists surrender and absolute obedience to the system of literalism and literal commands to which one has committed oneself. As the scope of what one hates grows apace it finds fruition in the binary opposition that is essential to it. Good and Evil divide the world in two, giving ontological form to the rigidity of the split that defines the fundamentalist psyche. All differences, all particularities, all complexities must give way to the demands of a comprehensive abstraction. And the fury of that abstraction can and will brook no exceptions. Everything thus resolves itself into the ultimate necessity required by the informing hatred. One longs for and demands an end to all the contingencies that have from the beginning been sources of fear and confusion. It is what one has always sought. To be done with all of it. With the contingency of the human. To be done with all ambiguity and complexity and confusion. Done with the feeling that history has no purpose other than chaos or meaningless repetition. Done with embodiment itself- and all the unwelcome desires it imposes on us. Done with the very sources of all that one hates and fears. To locate it all ontologically in a single principle-evil-and then be rid of it all once and for all through the triumph of that force that has the power to extinguish it all. ..... The world keeps seeping it. There must be a way to be done with it, once and for all. To find what one has craved from the beginning. The end. And a proper end-one that will give sublime expression to the desire that has fed the whole thing. Death. The longing for death transformed into a sublime celebration of death. Life in its complexity demands too much of us. That in a nutshell is the fundamentalist message. Only death can deliver one from the threat life poses. Only when life is done is one safe from a return of the projections and an eruption of the repressed. One has always longed for deliverance into a realm free of desire and all its temptations. Death alone offers the comfort one seeks. ..... Thank God for The Book of Revelations. For the only way both to satisfy and to purge one's hatred is to express it on a massive world-shattering scale. The death one seeks projected into the death one delivers. The self is thereby done with life and freed for transport of the saved split off self to a realm of bliss freed from all cares. A psyche wedded to thanatos has found in thanatos the final solution. One's resentment against life has been turned into a righteous and of necessity cosmic attack upon it. ... Here then a reading of the function that Revelations plays in the fundamentalist psyche. In the depths of its psyche fundamentalism is ruled by catastrophic anxiety, a self tottering on the brink of a dissolution in which it will fragment imprisoned in a world that will impose all of its terrors and evils upon it. We will fail to understand fundamentalism as long as we resist seeing how close it is to a psychosis. Fundamentalist rage is the attempt of a subject to hold itself together in the only way it can: by waging war on all that terrifies it. The psyche commits itself to destructiveness to allay a destruction that already threatens it from within. That condition results in a paradoxical situation that finds its only possible solution in Revelations. Destructiveness must be given a full, unchecked expression and the psyche must somehow survive that act. .... It is hard to conceive the extent of the contempt for life that informs fundamentalism. .... ~~~~~~~~~ Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University. He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu. from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html 1. LITERALISM "The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism" by By WALTER A. DAVISJanuary 8 / 9, 2005Bible Says The Psychology of Christian Fundamentalism By WALTER A. DAVIS "I know you're a Christian, but who are you a Christian against." Kenneth Burke In Apocalypse, a patient study of Christian fundamentalism based on extensive interviews over a five year period with members of apocalyptic communities Charles Strozier identifies four basic beliefs as fundamental to Christian fundamentalism. (1) Inerrancy or biblical literalism, the belief that every word of the Bible is to be taken literally as the word of God; (2) conversion or the experience of being reborn in Christ; (3) evangelicalism or the duty of the saved to spread the gospel; and (4) Apocalypticism or Endism, the belief that The Book of Revelations describes the events that must come to pass for God's plan to be fulfilled. [1] Revelations thus becomes an object of longing as well as the key to understanding contemporary history, to reading the news of the day and keeping a handle on an otherwise overwhelming world. Each of these categories, Strozier adds, must be understood not doctrinally but psychologically. What follows attempts to constitute such an understanding by analyzing each category as the progression of a disorder that finds the end it seeks in Apocalyptic destructiveness. ... I. Literalism "I don't do nuance." Dubya0 Literalism is the linchpin of fundamentalism; the literalization, if you will, of the founding psychological need. For an absolute certitude that can be established at the level of facts that will admit of no ambiguity or interpretation. ... But to eliminate ambiguity and confusion one must attack its source. Figurative language. That is the danger that must be avoided at all costs because in place of the literal figurative language introduces the play of meaning. The need to sustain complex connections at the level of thought (not fact) through the evolution of mental abilities that are necessarily connected with developing all the metaphoric resources of language. The literal in contrast puts an end to thought. It offers the mind a way to shut down, to reify itself. It thereby exorcises the greatest fear: interpretation and its inevitable result, the conflict of interpretations and with it the terror of being forever bereft of dogmatic certitudes. .... .... It's innermost necessity is the resistance to metaphor. For with metaphor one enters a world that has the power to unravel the literal mind. ... Literalism is the first line of defense of a mind that wants to put itself to sleep. ... The way: the refusal to comprehend anything that exceeds the limits of the simple declarative sentence. Two reductions thereby feed on one another: the world is reduced to facts and simples; the mind reduced to a permanently blank slate. Fundamentalism feeds on and fosters this reduction of the mind to the conditions of the immediate. For in fundamentalism literalism is raised to the status of a categorical imperative. It is the law that assures deliverance from all confusion. There is a single text, the Holy Bible. It contains clear, simple direct messages-proclamations-that establish the Truth once and for all. All of life's questions and contingencies are resolved by statements that are beyond change and interpretation. Literalism reduces reading and interpretation to the Cratylean dream: one need only point to the appropriate passage and "Pouf" all doubt and ambiguity about what one should think, believe, or desire on a given situation vanishes. ... When approached literally the Book of necessity takes on a number of other characteristics. Everything in it must be factual and nothing outside the book can contradict those facts. The very possibility of scientific investigation is sacrificed a priori to the need to proclaim the text's inerrancy. Every word of it must be the unalterable and unchanging word of God, which of course can contain no contradictions. ... The Book cannot be read progressively or retroactively, despite Christ's repeated claims to cancel the old law. An eye for an eye remains true for all time however out of keeping with the law of charity. After all, "It's in the Bible." That repeated assertion expresses the essence and fundamental paralysis of the literal mind. ... God's role is set by the limitations of the literal "imagination." His job is to lay down the law, once and for all, and in no uncertain terms; to be that super-ego who operates by the only logic that literalism permits-binary opposition. All conflicts and confusions must be resolved into a sharp, simple, and comprehensive opposition between Good and Evil. Else comes again the fit of contingency and ambiguity. Binarism is the realization in logic of the literalist attitude toward language. The reduction of language to the declarative statement is matched in binarism by a logic that turns everything into an abstract allegory. The most interesting reach of literalism comes, however, in the interpretation of the prophetic writings, especially Revelations. Here confronting what even it must see as image and metaphor, literalism performs the only operation that makes sense to it. The metaphoric is literalized. Armageddon must takes place on the plain of Jezreel near the ancient military fortification of Megiddo (35 miles southeast of Haifa), even though this patch of land "is not tomb enough and continent to hide the slain." .... Anything and everything that happens in the Middle East must be scanned as a sign that we are indeed moving toward the Tribulation. When he speaks prophetically God is playing a little game with us, to activate what in fundamentalism passes as the exercise of imagination. To make sense of the text requires the precise matching of its ornate and expressionist images to persons, places and events which are thereby assigned the only meaning they can have. Mapped onto history the Bible offers us an absolute certitude about history, thereby vanquishing the greatest contingency. ... All we have to do is literally match a prophecy to a contingency and Voila! we have attained literal certitude or, what amounts to the same thing, the fantasmatic imposition upon reality of what we want to believe. [2] In all these operations sustaining a literal interpretation of the Bible is a desperate necessity. Once let go of that and the Book slips away into the hands of those who eventually will find anything in it-liberation theology, Bonhoeffer's religionless Christianity, a searing message of love-since they will be guided in their reading by nothing but the attempt to sustain a heart in conflict with itself using a book to pry open the deepest and most conflicted registers of its own interiority. Who can tell, perhaps this approach could even lead to the discovery that the Book hates the simple minded; that it is indeed Kafkaesque in offering parables and prophecies that only deepen our burden by demanding an intelligence equal to the complexity of the human heart. Literalism is a cardinal necessity of the fundamentalist because it guarantees the primary psychological need. For a certitude that in its simplicity puts an end to all doubt, even to the possibility of doubt. That is what one must have and once attained what nothing can be permitted to alter. The literal meaning of words one need only point to for that meaning to be established must be imposed on the world without a blink of hesitation, a shadow of doubt, and when necessary beyond any appeal to the simplest claims of our humanity. .... ... Literalism protects the heart from everything, even its own deepest urgings. ... Literalism is the way, but hatred is the through line. That is why fundamentalist certitude always becomes rectitude with the Bible mined for all the things one can label abomination. Thereby a sensibility that wants to have nothing to do with the world takes revenge upon it. On the surface literalism looks like a characteristic of fundamentalism free of psychological motives; on investigation it reveals itself as one of the clearest signs of the psychological need in which the entire project is grounded. Literalism is the first realization of the psychological root of fundamentalism: a fear and hatred of the contingencies that constitute being in the world. That is the first threat that must be vanquished. ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Walter A. Davis is professor emeritus of English at Ohio State University. He is the author of Deracination: Historiocity, Hiroshima and the Tragic Imperative. He can be reached at: davis.65@osu.edu. ENDNOTES: (1) Charles Strozier, Apocalypse: On the Psychology of Fundamentalism in America (Boston: Beacon Press, 1994). (2) Fundamentalist readings of Revelations are an exercise in interpretive ingenuity in service to an ox-like stupidity. Every image in the text must be literalized and attached to a specific event or person. So that in the grandest feat of fundamentalist interpretation everything in Revelations squares with specific details of contemporary history. But of course this effort requires its own revisionism since this operation must be performed repeatedly, as it has been in America by fundamentalists since the 1840's. The same drama, ever approaching, ever delayed (and more's the pity), with history and its participants made stock figures in an abstract allegory. In service to the fundamentalist dream: that grand day when it will all finally fall into place, no more disappointing prefigurements, but the real thing. The act of interpretation in such a framework is both mechanical and mad. The frantic search is always on for events that will tie down and confirm the bizarre images of Revelations since they provide the secret code to the meaning of history. Thus the fundamentalist as reader driven half-mad in the constant mental gymnastics required to puzzle the whole thing out then just as constantly revise the thing, as events dictate, with no way to stop playing this game. from http://counterpunch.org/davis01082005.html -- Appealing Apostate: Prodigal Son Frank Schaeffer Roasts Religious RightJanuary 8th 2008 Writes Schaeffer in his book, "Pat Robertson.would have had a hard time finding work in any job where hearing voices is not a requirement." It's always interesting when a high-profile Religious Right activist has a change of heart. Consider Frank Schaeffer. The name may not be familiar to you, but Schaeffer's father, theologian and Presbyterian pastor Francis Schaeffer, was pivotal in the creation of the Religious Right. As John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute wrote recently, "In fact, without the influence of Francis Schaeffer, who often was prodded into action by Frank, the so-called Christian Right of today would not exist." Whitehead asserts that Francis Schaeffer's books How Should We Then Live? and Whatever Happened to the Human Race? "set the tone and agenda for the emerging Christian Right" and that without them "it is highly unlikely that people such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, Tim LaHaye and others would have had the political influence they wield." (Frank Schaeffer later made both books into films that were hugely influential in the evangelical community.) Frank Schaeffer shared his father's opinions and, as an adult, worked alongside him. He had an insider's view of the rise of the Religious Right. Father and son were there at the movement's birth and worked with some of its biggest names. What does Frank Schaeffer think about the Religious Right these days? Let's just say he's not a fan. He refers to Robertson as "a lunatic" and says Dobson is "a power-crazed political manipulator cynically abusing his followers." He calls the late Jerry Falwell an "unreconstructed bigot." Consider these choice quotes from Schaeffer's recently published book, Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back: * "What I slowly realized was that the religious-right leaders we were helping to gain power were not 'conservatives' at all, in the old sense of the world. They were anti-American religious revolutionaries." * "Pat Robertson.would have had a hard time finding work in any job where hearing voices is not a requirement." * "Dad could hardly have imagined how they would help facilitate the instantly corrupted power-crazy new generation of evangelical public figures like Ralph Reed, who took money from the casino industry while allegedly playing both sides against the middle in events related to the Abramoff Washington lobbyist scandal." * "Long before Ralph Reed and his ilk came on the scene, Dad got sick of 'these idiots' as he often called people like Dobson in private. They were 'plastic,' Dad said, and 'power-hungry.'" * "There were three kinds of evangelical leaders: The dumb or idealistic ones who really believed. The out-and-out charlatans. And the smart ones who still believed - sort of - but knew that the evangelical world was sh*t, but who couldn't figure out any way to earn as good a living anywhere else." * "Dad seemed lost in a depressed daze. He had recently been saying privately that the evangelical world was more or less being led by lunatics, psychopaths, and extremists, and agreeing with me that if 'our side' ever won, America would be in deep trouble." Ouch. Opponents sometimes accuse Americans United of being too critical of the Religious Right, but these days it seems some of the most pointed barbs are coming from people like Schaeffer, Whitehead and syndicated columnist Cal Thomas. (Thomas, a former Moral Majority employee, coauthored Blinded by the Might: Why the Religious Right Can't Save America in 2000.) In a recent interview with Whitehead, Schaeffer discussed his break with the Religious Right, remarking, "I personally came to believe that a lot of the issues that were being latched onto by the Christian Right, whether it was the gay issue or abortion or other things, were actually being used for negative political purposes. They were used to structure a power base for people who then threw their weight around." He continues, "The other thing I began to understand is that in dismissing the whole culture as decadent, in dismissing the public school movement as godless, in talking about anybody who opposed them as evil, the Religious Right was only a mirror image of the New Left..What gets left out is a basic discussion about the United States and the reality of living here, the freedoms we enjoy and the benefits of a pluralistic culture where people are not crushing each other over beliefs." Elsewhere in the interview, Schaeffer says that banning all abortions is unrealistic, criticizes the Religious Right for gay bashing and calls George W. Bush "arguably the worst president in the history of the United States." Advocates of church-state separation won't agree with everything Schaeffer has to say, but the interview is well worth a look. It's a helpful reminder that people from all walks of life oppose the goals of the Religious Right - including some folks who know it best because they once saw its ugly inner workings up close and personal. By Rob Boston http://blog.au.org/2008/01/08/appealing-apostate-prodigal-son-frank-schaeffer-roasts-religious-right/ A Psychological Analysis of FundamentalismFundamentalism is a religious movement, a theological & philosophical stand, a political and social force. I regard it most basically as a particular variety of psychological development. Fundamentalists of all religious and political varieties share the same character traits. It is the psychological character of the fundamentalist that is at the root of the ideological interpretation termed "fundamentalism," not an intellectual or spiritual concept. b.. Ethical development at the "reward and punishment" stage: morality must be defined and enforced by an external authority. c.. A lot of guilt and fear about sex. d.. Basic distrust of human beings; certainty that "uncontrolled," human beings will be bad and vicious, particularly in sexual ways. e.. Low tolerance for ambiguity. Everything must be clear cut, black and white. Nothing can be "possibly true but unproven at this time, we're still studying it." Fundamentalists regard science as flawed precisely because science changes. (A striking characteristic of fundamentalists is that their response to any setback which may instill doubt is to step up evangelizing for converts.) f.. Literalism, usually including a limited sense of humor. g.. Distrust of their own judgment, or any other human being's judgment. h.. Fear of the future. The driving motivation of fundamentalism appears to outsiders to be fear that oneself or the group one identifies with is losing power and prerequisites and is in danger from others who are gaining power. This is not how fundamentalists put it. i.. A low self-esteem that finds satisfaction in being one of the Elect, superior to all others. It seems to be particularly rewarding to know that rich people have a real hard time getting into Heaven. b.. Other factors -- sometimes mental, emotional, or even physical abuse -- that minimized self-esteem. c.. For those who grew up fundamentalist, the church was the central activity of family life, all else was subsidiary to the church, and social interaction with "non-believers" was discouraged, except when evangelizing. d.. Those who have converted to fundamentalism often grew up without any firm philosophical framework, or experienced some trauma that destroyed their former framework. They were at a time in their lives when they needed absolute Answers.
b.. The group, and the authority figure(s) within the group, withhold or bestow love to control behavior. Misbehaving members are cut off from communication. c.. They magnify current social and individual evils and dwell on the "innate wickedness of man." d.. Sexual "immorality" is often their central cause. e.. They promote a Truth which is superior to all other truths because it is absolute and unchanging. f.. They promote distrust of one's personal judgment, being subject instead to the given truths of the group, the judgment of the church as a body, or the proclamations of a central authority figure. g.. They are apocalyptic, foretelling an immanent and horrifying future which only the faithful will survive. Any disaster in the news is magnified as "a sign of the apocalypse. a.. An unconditional self-esteem and (usually in consequence) an unconditional love of others. b.. A tolerance -- even enjoyment -- of ambiguity and diverse beliefs. One can cheerfully live with the fact that one's neighbor on one side believes that his little blue pickup truck is God and one's neighbor on the other side doesn't believe in God at all, and feel no compulsion to convert either of them. One is not frightened to question one's faith or explore alternatives. c.. Free social and intellectual interaction with others, beyond -- or even without -- evangelism. d.. A trust that one can "figure things out," along with a willingness to learn from others and to change one's mind. e.. A faith that whatever the fluctuations in life and society, things can and will get better. A feeling of personal responsibility and resolve to make it so. f.. A sense of humor. b.. Intellectual process: a build-up of contradictions between taught morality and the behavior of church authorities and members; unresolved questions in study of the Bible; what is taught about the world vs observation. c.. Receiving unconditional love and acceptance from a non-fundamentalist. d.. A strengthened self-esteem, with the loss of the need for others to be Wrong. e.. A spiritual epiphany, with a new faith that one's relationship with God is not conditional on "perfect" faith or behavior, that it can grow and change. Fundamentalists Anonymous: Twelve Steps to Sanityby Lee Adams Young-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All who have chosen to walk away from biblical fundamentalism are welcome to join Fundamentalists Anonymous, and to consider embracing the following Twelve Steps: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. I realize that I had turned control of my mind over to another person or group, who had assumed power over my thinking. 2. That person or group persuaded me of the inerrancy of the Bible, in spite of its many internal contradictions. 3. I became addicted to the Bible as the supreme focus of my faith, in spite of the commandment that God should come first. 4. I admit to God, to myself and to another person the shortcomings of my belief in the unbelievable. 5. I have made an inventory of my false claims about the Bible. 6. I have made a list of those whom I led into confusion about the Bible. 7. I am willing to make amends to all those whom I may have led astray. 8. I realize that I have the inner power to restore sanity to my life and to search Scripture for the truth. 9. I will reach out to friends who can help me clarify my thinking about the Bible, God and Jesus. 10. I confess that only with God's help can my mind grasp the truth. 11. I will seek through prayer and meditation to improve my conscious contact with God, praying for knowledge of God's will for me and the power to carry that out. 12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these twelve steps, I will offer these steps to other former biblical fundamentalists. These 12 steps are adapted from those of Alchoholics Anonymous. from http://www.geocities.com/church_of_hank/fundamentalists_anonymous.html JACK T CHICK TRACTSSee real Chick tracts at http://www.chick.com/default.asp ... Oh, great. Dinosaurs. And man. Coexisting. Again. An insight into the Fundamentalist mindFor a Fiunmdamentalist to find out about a subject the fundamentalist must only ever read books written by those approved by one's church on the topic. One doesn't go to the source of the knowledge because one might be contaminated by the secular humanist, new age, pagan writer who is not a fellow Fundamentalist. One also buys the book from one's local Trew Kristyun Bible & Assorted Kitsch Bookstore.I've been looking for a cheap edition of a particular book by Soren Kierkegaard for a while. Visiting friends in Sydney, my wife and I looked around the largest Christian bookstore in Sydney. They had plenty of books ABOUT Kierkegaard ... telling how he was of the devil ... but not one single copy of anything that he wrote. In their "Philospophy" section there were people like C S Lewis (an armchair philosopher and not particularly very good) and plenty of Fundamentalist foolosophers but not one single book by any philosopher that you would study at university. A bookstore without real books! I'm sure it's a policy to dumb people down in the current Fundamentalist Dark Age. Why Did The Fundy Cross The Road?1. He was following a trail of "Chick" tracts.2. She was going to meet her preacher at a motel over there and audition for a missionary position. 3. To buy his beer and porn, since none of his fellow church members lived on that side of town. 4. He wasn't sure why, so he stopped to pray about it and was hit by a church bus. 5. Because, there were two blacks and a jew walking on her side of the road. 6. Taking a short cut to a new sub-division, trying to beat the mormans and jehovah's witnesses to all those virgin doors. 7. He was trying to walk off a boner that had arose while watching "The Passion of the Christ" for the fourth time. 8. She was on her way to partake in one of fundyism's most holy of rituals at the "The Big Hair Beauty Shop". 9. He was walking back home after the bomb he was wearing failed to explode on the bus and he had only purchased a one way ticket. 10. She was taking a group of home schoolers on an educational field trip to an anti-abortion rally. 11. To lay hands on that dead possum and heal it, if not, he had take home for supper. 12. He was a black fundy walking home after a white fundy cab driver refused to stop and give him a ride. 13. I don't know, but it was a cross road, he stepped on a nail and suffered all the way home. 14. He could get a better view of the young, catholic, school girls in their little, short uniforms from over there. 15. He was trying to get back to his double parked cross before the meter maid could give him a ticket. 16. He was going over there to view a pile of stepped in dog shit, that was said to look like the face of Jesus Christ. 17. He was walking to McDonalds to apply for a job after the world failed to come to an end the day before, he had quit his job and signed his car and house over to his preacher. 18. I don't know, but it's dangerous as hell to cross a two lane road with blinders on. 19. He was leading his family to the church grounds for the unveiling of the new Strom Thurmond statue. 20. Because, the road took a LEFT turn. 21. He was trying to find that damn chicken and exorcise it, after he heard it was laying deviled eggs. 22. To find a better spot for his " I Hate Fags" sign. 23. I don't know why, but I'll bet he goes to hell for it. 24. He saw the sign that read "Cross Walk", and he wanted to walk in Jesus' footsteps. 25. She was taking the long way around the block to church, so all the neighbors could see her new easter clothes. 26. He was trying to catch that damn chicken, so his wife could cook it up for the preacher on sunday. 27. No reason.......No reason at all! 28. (Sing Along Now) HE SAW THE LIGHT, PRAISE THE LORD HE SAW THE LIGHT from Christianity Revealed Web Site http://www.jdstone.org/cr (Spelling corrected) PASTOR DALE K WHANGKE - An awesome Blog!Visit My Christian Blog http://mypage.cooeey.com/mypage.asp?user=DaleKWhangke Pastor Dale K. Whangke Bill HicksThe late comedian Bill Hicks used to say 'If you don't like what I say about God, then forgive me...' Fundamentalist Christian HomeschoolingMy main views on homeschooling are summarised in this post. I have helped many homeschoolers as a professional educator including loaning out school materials for their use and testing children. I am totally opposed to poor education and the majority of homeschooling by fundamentalist Christians is poor education for the reasons given below.
Note that ASSESSMENT & INSPECTIONS are MANDATORY!!!!! ********************************************************* BJU Accreditation Through TRACS Bob Jones University is a member of the Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools (TRACS) [PO Box 328, Forest, VA 24551; Telephone: 434.525.9539; email: i...@tracs.org] having been awarded Candidate status as a Category IV institution by the TRACS Accreditation Commission on April 6, 2005; this status is effective for a period of five years. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2. A BEKA BOOKS ..... There are plenty of other ways to run afoul of the rules. Last spring Timothy Dow was caught playing the video game Halo 2. Such games are banned by the college. Movies are also forbidden, including those rated G. Music is restricted to classical or approved Christian ("contemporary Christian" artists are deemed too worldly). Students are allowed to watch television news at 6 o'clock, but that's it. The TVs are controlled by college employees, who flip a switch to black out the commercials, lest students see anything inappropriate. ...... > ROBINSON SELF-TEACHING HOME SCHOOL CURRICULUM ##############################################################
- TOTALLY dependent upon good literacy skills to begin with.
Educators point out peer interaction is a valuable and necessary component of a good academic lesson plan. Class discussion, oral reports, and cooperative learning assignments such as small group projects are important segments of the modern classroom day. Most teachers consider them vital to a total educational experience. Some of the reasons this is true may in fact be among fundamentalists' objections to public education. Peer interaction
Fundamentalists teach the story of Jesus' resurrection as history. Yet, they cannot teach the contradictory events and time lines of the various versions without adding explanations that defy both logic and Biblical scholarship. The Bible as the Golden Calf of Fundamentalism> The "Book" has become a Golden Calf of its own making.. thanks to fundamentalists.
"FUNDAMENTALISTS - The arseholes in the Body of Christ" "Sheep shit on shepherd's shoes, by any other name, still stinks." (paraphrasing Bono)
WILL for those about to be rapturedTrew Kristyun spellun left intact. ;-) ........
from http://www.nonraptured.com/will.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Inherting from the Raptured If we put our minds to it, most of us know someone who is fairly certain they'll be raptured. They may not be considering this, but why not leave all their earthly belongings to you -- their nonraptured friend -- rather than letting them fall through to a worldwide government run by The Beast and Satan's minions? You do not even need to be that close if much of this
{ Last Page } { Page 1 of 3 } { Next Page } |
About MeMy Profile Archives Friends My Photo Album Podcast Files
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||